Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you know that you didn't have to be born in the U.S. to run for president?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:10 AM
Original message
Did you know that you didn't have to be born in the U.S. to run for president?
Put this one under, "All those lies they taught me in my formative years."

You can actually be born on foreign land and still be eligible to run for president. I don't know all the rules, if there are any (I think they're making it up as they go along), but I know John McCain is an illustrious example of the exception:

"John Sidney McCain III (born August 29, 1936) is an American politician. An influential Republican, McCain is currently the senior U.S. Senator from Arizona.

Born in Coco Solo in the American-controlled Panama Canal Zone, the son and grandson of United States Navy Admirals, McCain was educated at Episcopal High School in Alexandria, Virginia and the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain

And:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:14 AM
Original message
I thought you just had to be a natural-born citizen
whether you were born in the U.S. or outside the country to American parents, as McCain was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Apparently, if you are born anywhere in the world
to U.S. parents, you are a "natural-born" U.S. citizen and therefore eligible to serve as president so long as you have resided in the U.S. for 14 years and are at least 35 years of age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's probably the best summary.
I absolutely missed the nuance. Or more to the point, it was never stressed. I should know because I was born similar to John McCain's circumstances, except that one parent didn't become a U.S. citizen for decades, and I was always used as an example of someone who could never run for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yeah I have a friend who gets that a lot
Her parents brought her here from Russia some time after the fall of the Soviet Union. She's completely loyal to the U.S. and extremely competent; with 20 years of experience in public service I think she'd make an excellent President. But alas, her parents are not citizens, so she is deemed unworthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. not "unworthy"
just not legally eligible...there is a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. My grandfather was born in France but was considered a
native born American citizen because his father was in the US diplomatic service. He lived and died with dual native born citizenship of France and the United States. It is likely that the same thing is true of McCain and not what you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think it's pretty definite that McCain qualifies.
I'm just surprised that I didn't pick up on this nuance for, oh, all of my life. I think adults repeat what they hear and sometimes don't delve into the fine details, and that's how broad statements create misunderstandings.

That's why we have lawyers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well the Constitution says, quite explicity, "natrual-born citizen"
or a resident of the U.S. at the time the Constitution was ratified, which includes the first six presidents. I think the confusion stems from the definition of "natual-born". We all just assumed that it meant "born in the U.S." not "born anywhere in the world to two U.S. citizens".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I think in the days of the buggy and train, that "natural-born citizen"
did imply that they had to be born on U.S. soil. At some point, with the advent of travel, and especially with our military presence around the war, that all changed. Even Wiki suggests that it's an on-going debate:

"There is currently debate concerning the definition of natural born citizen. The main focus of this debate is whether or not children born to Americans overseas be considered eligible for the Presidency."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. There are plots of land that are classed as USA all over the world
We leased the Canal Zone at one time. If you recall Iran took over US land/building at one time. I believe if you were born in such places you are in fact born on US land. FDR son could not be President as he was born in Can. at a home used for vacation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'll have to read the law a little closer.
Do both parents have to be American citizens at the time of birth, for instance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Only one must be a US Citizen, according to current statute.
Edited on Sun Jan-21-07 07:43 AM by mcscajun
http://travel.state.gov/family/family_issues/birth/birth_593.html

The birth of a child abroad to U.S. citizen parent(s) should be reported as soon as possible to the nearest American consular office for the purpose of establishing an official record of the child’s claim to U.S. citizenship at birth. The official record is in the form of a Consular Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the United States of America. This document, referred to as the Consular Report of Birth or FS-240, is considered a basic United States citizenship document. An original FS-240 is furnished to the parent(s) at the time the registration is approved

REPORTING THE BIRTH

A Consular Report of Birth can be prepared only at an American consular office overseas while the child is under the age of 18. Usually, in order to establish the child’s citizenship under the appropriate provisions of U.S. law, the following documents must be submitted:

(1) an official record of the child’s foreign birth;
(2) evidence of the parent(s)’ U.S. citizenship (e.g., a certified birth certificate, current U.S.
passport, or Certificate of Naturalization or Citizenship);
(3) evidence of the parents’ marriage, if applicable; and
(4) affidavits of parent(s)’ residence and physical presence in the United States.

In certain cases, it may be necessary to submit additional documents, including affidavits of paternity and support, divorce decrees from prior marriages, or medical reports of blood compatibility. All evidentiary documents should be certified as true copies of the originals by the registrar of the office wherein each document was issued. A service fee of $65 is prescribed under the provisions of Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 22.1, item 9, for a Consular Report of Birth.

NOTE: Consular Reports of Birth are not available for persons born in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Panama Canal Zone before October 1, 1979, the Philippines before July 4, 1946, American Samoa, Guam, Swains Island, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the former U.S. Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands. Birth certificates for those areas, except the Panama Canal Zone, must be obtained from their respective offices of vital statistics. Panama Canal Zone birth certificates should be requested through the Vital Records Section of Passport Services (see address below.) The fees are the same as those for DS-1350.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. NO WAY!
I'm nearly fifty years old, and I was led to believe my entire life that I didn't qualify.

Hilary, move over, you've got competition!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. But were the proper papers filed? nt
Please say they were. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I have this document which definitely establishes my US citizenship, however,
the picture is so Gawd-Awful, that, that alone would prevent me from running for office. The t.v. entertainment circuit would have a field day. The only way I could overcome it, however, is if ugly became fashionable, which taking into account the popularity of the Ugly Betty t.v. show, is a possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Hey, do you think McCain is "good-looking"? I sure don't.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. LOL!
It's funny how you determine if someone is good looking or not, based on the kind of person they are. Whatever I may have thought of him years ago, he comes across as very sleazy and someone I would never trust, therefore, unattractive.

On the other hand, I just looked up an old photo of Shirley Chisholm and the first thought that crossed my mind when I looked at her 1970s photo is, they don't make them like that anymore. Just beautiful, inside and out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. I have always read that in his day Geo. Washington was a looker
That people could not take their eyes off him. He was very tall with red hair and wore a uniform. Please do not tell me that is why he was our first President. I have also read he was a man of some value who his whole life made it his aim to be a better person. Let us hope that is why he was picked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. i always read he had wooden teeth and a wife w. smallpox scars
i wouldn't think an exceptionally handsome man would be married to an exceptionally physically plain woman but who knows

i think to most folks born in the 20th century anybody that ain't got their teeth can't really fall into the category of "looker," it's outside our reality vortex
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Plots of land aka
the rest of the world :rofl: apart from which I guess it must also include all US embaasies ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruiner4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yupper... Embassies would be considered US soil...
My first girlfriend was born in Tehran...When she told me, I did a :wtf: and she told me her dad was in the marines and her parents were based at the embassy.. She was born there but is considered US natural..

A lucky post script, his tour ended about a year b4 the hostage situation..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnies Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. I thought
you were a citizen of the country you were born in, just like the illegals coming across the border and giving birth, their kid becomes a US citizen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. My sister and brother were born
in Germany and Chile. My parents were US citizens and my sister and brother hold dual citizenship. They hold citizenship in the country they were born in and in the US. I understand that the US does not recognize dual citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Netanyahu has dual citizenship.
So do all my cousins who were born to an American parent, even though they were born on foreign soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slater71 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. You are right.
My son was born in Spain. He has a duel citizenship with two birth certificates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthlover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. Key words are....
"Born in Coco Solo in the American-controlled Panama Canal Zone"

McCain was born of American citizens in an American contolled territory. This would make a good arguement for natural born. He was not born in any country in the world, but in an American-controlled area, which was not the sovereignty at that time of another country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenbriar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. you have to be a natural born citizen
McCains parents were citizens and he was born while his parents were on duty for America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. So, what are the factors?
Two parents, not one? And the birth must come at a time when the parents are on duty for America? And, apparently, the necessary papers must be signed.

Do you realize that this is not the understanding of what "natural born citizen" use to mean when I was younger? Something changed in the last fifty years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melm00se Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. without digging deeply
into the law, I would assume that "natural born citizen" is one who is born into their US citizenship rather than having to go thru some process of obtaining their US citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Canal Zone WAS the US . My brother was born there
Edited on Sun Jan-21-07 09:23 PM by SoCalDem
Same for Puerto Rico, Samoa, Guam or ANY US military installation or embassy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC