Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Opens Her Campaign With Health Insurance Plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 10:59 PM
Original message
Clinton Opens Her Campaign With Health Insurance Plan
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/us/politics/22clinton.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin

With a 4-year-old girl clutching her hand, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton began her newborn presidential campaign yesterday at a Manhattan health care clinic, announcing legislation that would significantly expand federal health insurance for Americans under age 18.

Mrs. Clinton said her husband, Bill, and their daughter, Chelsea, would play “support system” roles for her, and she pledged to continue protecting New York’s interests in Washington even as she campaigns in Iowa and New Hampshire.

She said she wanted to be president because she was “worried about our country” and wanted to “put it back on the right course.”

She made no reference to the other seven Democratic candidates, other than to say the race would be a great contest and that “a lot of talented people” were running.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is an excellent start
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. It'll take a village "to put this country back on the right course". Hill
knows how to orchestrate the course correction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good. I hope she reminds everybody that she tried to fix this mess
before it got as bad as it is today, and the Pubs tarred & feathered her for it! We wouldn't be in this mess if she could have gotten her health care plan passedway back when!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Change - Not Fix n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is not a good strategy.
She screwed it up last time, though she meant well. Couldn't she have waited at least a couple of weeks? Oh man...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I agree--why dredge up all that excess baggage
Edited on Sun Jan-21-07 11:14 PM by rocknation
when there are so many other Repub policies she could be promising to fix?

:shrug:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I don't think she really screwed it up last time. The lobbyists went out there in full force
and misrepresented what her plan was all about. Remember those Harry & Louise ads? The lobbyists on the right wanted people to believe they would not have any choice in who their doctor would be, etc. They lied about what was in her plan.

I think the major thing that she took away from that, is that you don't always need a major new government program to get things done. After her health care plan failed, you saw the Clinton Administration doing good things with health-care in smaller ways. They passed smaller bills. For example, the bill that stopped what President Clinton called "drive-by" deliveries. Meaning it was no longer acceptable to just kick a woman out of the hospital 24 hours after giving birth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. I guess Hillary's plan does not include millions of adults like me with no health insurance.
Among other reasons, this precludes me from voting for her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. The problem with her last health care reform proposal was that it
was full of half-measures and overly deferential to the insurance and pill indiustries. Is this any better.

I'm growing increasingly impatient with the lack of huevos among our elected leaders to back the single-payer system endorsed by the majority of Americans. I'm not singling H. Clinton out here, but this does represent another such example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. This isn't even anything new
all it is is an extension of a bill that is scheduled to be renewed. She wants to make it more available to those with a higher income. This is part of her job as a Senator really not a new proposal:

Mrs. Clinton’s proposed legislation would renew the Children’s Health Insurance Program, which provides money to states to cover Americans under age 18 whose families earn too much money to qualify for Medicaid. The 10-year-old program, which now covers four million children, is to expire this fall.



http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/22/us/politics/22clinton.html?_r=1&ref=politics&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. John Edwards supports universal health care NOW see link
You'll have to scroll down the article, but he is in favor of universal health care.

http://www.johnedwards.com/news/headlines/ap20061230/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. in her position she should never mention any opponent's name
either in the primary or the general if she is in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. She had better start addressing Iraq, her stance, and the future. Until we are
out of there, there will be no room or money to address US priorities, and there are many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The Children is a sweet, safe issue.
Ya see, Hillary is for "The Children". Is anybody against them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC