Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Again: The Fairness Doctrine does not mean "equal time"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
HomerRamone Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 11:35 PM
Original message
Again: The Fairness Doctrine does not mean "equal time"

http://mediamatters.org/items/200410130008

The "equal time" doctrine is alive and well in current federal law. Here's what the law says:

If any licensee shall permit any person who is a legally qualified candidate for any public office to use a broadcasting station, he shall afford equal opportunities to all other such candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station: Provided, That such licensee shall have no power of censorship over the material broadcast under the provisions of this section. No obligation is imposed under this subsection upon any licensee to allow the use of its station by any such candidate.

In 2003, the National Association of Broadcasters informed broadcast stations reaching California residents that in order to comply with the equal time provision, they were to refrain from showing movies starring then-gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger.

The law contains exceptions for broadcasts that qualify as "bona fide" newscasts, news interviews, news documentaries, and live news events.

The Journal's editorial board is confusing this principle in current law with the "fairness doctrine," a policy the FCC abandoned in August 1987. The fairness doctrine required licensees to "cover vitally important controversial issues of interest in their communities" and "provide a reasonable opportunity for the presentation of contrasting viewpoints." The doctrine also codified what became known as the "personal attack rule" and the "editorial rule." The personal attack rule required broadcasters to notify the subjects of on-air personal attacks that an attack had occurred and to then provide them with an opportunity to respond. Similarly, the editorial rule allowed political candidates to respond either to criticisms or station endorsements of another candidate. None of these provisions required "equal time" for candidates or issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well then, I have a question:
Every time you turn on the Sunday blabfests, there is presidential candidate Guiseppe Bideni, pontificating at length, breadth, and depth. Followed closely by St. John McCain, patron saint of liars. They are on by a wide margin as well.

Where's the fairness doctrine there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "a policy the FCC abandoned in August 1987"
that's where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. that "personal attack rule" would break rw radio and faux news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC