|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 09:48 PM Original message |
Clinton voted for the Patriot Act and she voted for the war in Iraq, |
Refresh | +13 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
tangerine1700
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. perfect! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 09:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Welcome to DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RFKJrNews
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. We need to check each candidate's voting record with care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Bitwit1234
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
31. I guess if Obama had been in the senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:13 PM Response to Reply #31 |
62. This is why I won't vote for Obama ...WTF was he doing when he wasn't there to vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
54. Hi! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
rodeodance
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
3. geesh!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
lojasmo
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. Edwards too. EOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DesertRat
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:09 PM Response to Original message |
5. Edwards also voted for the Patriot Act and the Iraq War Resolution.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:10 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. That's one of the reasons I am for Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DesertRat
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
67. Me too. No more warmongers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
liskddksil
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. and apologized for his war vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DesertRat
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:20 PM Original message |
I'm glad he apologized, but it still showed poor judgement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:12 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Edwards co-sponsored the IWR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KewlKat
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:13 PM Response to Reply #5 |
10. Edwards not only voted for the Patriot Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
liskddksil
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. and Edwards pushed hard to get the sunset clause in the Patriot Act |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. Clinton voted to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
11. A few half-baked Democrats are always crying about Hillary's "baggage" but never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Since when is pushing for Kucinich being a drag on the Democratic party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clintonista2
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. Since Kucinich decided he would choose a racist republican VP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. That's just repuke gossip |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clintonista2
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:25 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. I did and what's your excuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Clintonista2
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Oh you did? Glad you agree with me now. n/t. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
41. far from it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #20 |
45. Here you go ...educate yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #45 |
79. There was audio of it...go listen... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
SaveElmer
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. You are right...Kucinich is such a non-factor... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
oasis
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Regurgitating right-wing talking points against a party leader will always be a drag on the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Oh ok follow the leader like a pied piper then ...your choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
34. Riiight. But regurgitating rw talking points is independent thinking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #17 |
49. Sorry ...I never read anything from the repukes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Yeah, you do. They just don't tell you who they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:02 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Even if I were to listen to a repuke ...are you saying that everyone of them is an idiot and a liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:26 PM Response to Reply #55 |
70. And not all of them advocate LaRouche's theories, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. I think some of the criticism is more than justified. Hillary biggest weakness is she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:42 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Well, that's just naive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. Funny ...IMO it was her laugh I thought was disingenuous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:55 PM Response to Reply #40 |
48. I think the post was being sarcastic, and I agree with you, the laugh was as phony as it comes /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #48 |
74. No. I was NOT being sarcastic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #32 |
46. None of us at DU our disingenuous, we just have different points of view /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
niceypoo
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
18. Now the Clintons are a "Crime family?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Clinton was very right leaning and weakened the democratic party by his actions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Yeah, she's the spit of Scalia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. It is funny that the critics only look at one or two issues, but never the whole person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:22 PM Response to Reply #39 |
66. Hey, I'm voting for Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:29 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. Hey, that is who I am voting for in the primaries also. He is the most straight on the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
76. They have also lost their abillity to actually read the point of the op. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:17 AM Response to Reply #76 |
88. you are right. I got somewhat confused also. However, it does demonstrate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:35 AM Response to Reply #88 |
94. Peace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #23 |
35. So when he appointed Ginsberg and Souter to the Supreme Court, was that "very" right wing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:46 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. ask the poor if being kicked off the welfare roles was democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #37 |
44. Please, have you ever heard of Teach America? Clinton is a HUGE advocate of helping 3rd world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:00 PM Response to Reply #44 |
53. The way he was able to eliminate the deficit was by dissolving the welfare system of that time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:20 PM Response to Reply #53 |
64. Reagan was the cause of the huge deficiet, and the start of destroying the welfare system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #37 |
75. Uh, so where did the poor go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:40 PM Response to Reply #75 |
78. Yea well I help feed some of them every Saturday and you are welcome to come eat with them and us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:13 AM Response to Reply #78 |
86. How many? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:47 AM Response to Reply #86 |
97. Last week it was 69 people. This week it was 29. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
50. Souter wasn't appointed by Clinton. Just votes as if he were. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:05 PM Response to Reply #50 |
57. Thank you for the correction, should have been breyer. That was a pretty good screw up on my part |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:20 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. I'm too harsh on the Clintons? Yikes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. Harsh in reference to the term "right wingers" Right wingers are this administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:25 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. You seriously have me confused with someone else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:31 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. Sorry, have a good evening /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:44 PM Response to Reply #69 |
81. Dude ...you really need to look at what my opinion is which was the point of the op |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TheModernTerrorist
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
84. Clinton WAS an amazing world leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. and she also voted for the Iran War resolution. Personally I believe she lacks good judgement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:25 PM Response to Original message |
25. Crime family??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:26 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:30 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. This post just made my weekend |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:44 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Did Hillary Clinton Attend Bilderberg Conference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:50 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. ALEX JONES is your source??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
65. Did you actually read my opinion at the bottom of the op? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
maddiejoan
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:57 PM Response to Reply #33 |
51. Then you can toss out Edwards too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
36. Alex Jones/ infowars |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:47 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. The truth by any source is not acceptable here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mtnsnake
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:49 PM Response to Reply #38 |
42. Yours and Jones' truth were blown to shreds by poster #25. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 10:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
47. Yes I realize some people do not consider the Bilderberg group as being criminals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:03 PM Response to Reply #47 |
56. Here are few other attendees: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:06 PM Response to Reply #56 |
58. Thanks much for the partial list. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cameron27
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:08 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. I left the link, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:09 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. sorry ...thanks again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
HughMoran
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
61. Albert Einstein wakes from a deep sleep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:28 PM Response to Reply #61 |
71. Honey, if it wasn't in a scientific journal vetted by his peers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
BenDavid
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
77. This is getting old. same shit, different day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
80. More lies. More distortion. More right-wing talking points designed to divide and conquer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:52 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Again ...read my opinion to see what the point of the op was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Evergreen Emerald
![]() |
Sat Dec-01-07 11:54 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. I got the "point" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
85. bwahahaha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #85 |
87. The point is that we vote for whoever looks the best on tv. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #87 |
89. Actually, I think your post has some interesting and unintentional consequences |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:27 AM Response to Reply #89 |
92. Thanks ...I watched that JFK/Nixon debate on a bw tv back then... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
still_one
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:41 AM Response to Reply #92 |
96. no, you are right on. At that time they were saying the women vote favored Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
cali
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:22 AM Response to Reply #87 |
90. there's a certain truth to that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:34 AM Response to Reply #90 |
93. I don't favor anyone involved with groups that subvert the will of the people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
91. Gobama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
L0oniX
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:40 AM Response to Reply #91 |
95. LOL ...what's that Kerry/Edwards sign doing there? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 12:49 AM Response to Reply #95 |
98. keynote speech Dem Convention 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
samsingh
![]() |
Sun Dec-02-07 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
99. yup. scary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC