|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
deadparrot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:44 PM Original message |
Did you know? Washington and Lincoln "authorized electronic surveillance." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
1. I can just imagine those telegraph operators now.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
2. "We believe we are following the law." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unschooler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:15 PM Response to Reply #2 |
30. "I BELIEVED there was no relationship with Ms. Lewinsky." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mike Nelson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:46 PM Response to Original message |
3. I wouldn't mind Washington, Lincoln or FDR so much... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
4. He didn't really say that did he????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #4 |
18. He said it. I kept hoping I was just having some kind of psychotic event |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Velveteen Ocelot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
5. So how, exactly, did Washington authorize electronic surveillance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PatrioticLeftie (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yeah, Abe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:48 PM Response to Original message |
7. how visionary of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kisstheman (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. Telegraphs and phones; what's the difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:54 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. welll, apart from the fact that they DIDN'T have telegraph in washington's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kisstheman (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. please understand a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. oh, I understand jokes just fine. what bothers me is that your response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kisstheman (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Don worry I think they are caught on this one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opiate69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:55 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. telegraphs?? in the 1700s?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kisstheman (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:00 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. You got me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opiate69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. did you forget the sarcasm tag then? If so, my apologies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kisstheman (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:09 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. My bad I did not. I had to actually check to see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Well, that would explain why Specter didn't want to have Gonzo under oath |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinfoilinfor2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
10. Nope. Ben Franklin did run around with a kite and a key tied to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wilms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. That's what Ben Franklin wanted you to think he was doing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Twist_U_Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
11. alberto portrait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:58 PM Response to Reply #11 |
19. Eyes: down and to the left. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poiuyt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
12. Yes but it was legal for Washington and Lincoln to do electronic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azurnoir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
15. did they share a Delorian or did they each have their own? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
16. One if by land, two if by sea? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Patsy Stone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:01 PM Response to Original message |
23. Somehow, he never got up to Nixon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
27. dang, we should rescind President's Day immediately. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewoden (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
28. Hey man that Washington guy was just... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vademocrat (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Nope - ole GW had wooden teeth - bad conductors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewoden (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:26 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. actually several sets of teeth , including human teeth set in lead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vademocrat (962 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:40 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I didn't know that - I remember seeing his wooden dentures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:15 PM Response to Original message |
29. Hey Folks... There WAS Electronic Surveillance In Washington's Day !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tom Yossarian Joad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
32. K&R!!!!! Keep this at the top! All must see this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peekaloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:24 PM Response to Original message |
33. He just out-dumbassed Cornyn's Hogan Heroes remark. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:29 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. oh geez, what did I miss on THAT one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peekaloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:34 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Cornyn attributed his knowledge of the Geneva Convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. these people just get stupider every single day, don't they: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Redstone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
38. I'm not sure I can take any more of this. It would be laughable if it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-06-06 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
39. Damn you Washington, adding a third cup to the string |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 01:53 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC