Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

when is the last time America had five years as bad as 2001-2005?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 05:59 PM
Original message
when is the last time America had five years as bad as 2001-2005?
I think it must have been the Great Depression (another artifact of repuke rule).

Certainly in my lifetime (50 years) I've never seen a stretch like this, with virtually every measure of the average American's life in such freefall.

Disregarding the government's lies, more people are out of work or grossly underemployed than I ever remember.

Almost no one I know is still on a normal career track.

50 million with no health care coverage and the costs of care for those who do have insurance making it impossible to actually use the system

more in poverty than anytime since the 50's

The nation so divided along dogmatic political and/or religious lines that families often don't even talk to one another

War. illegal, unjustifiable war.

complete meltdown of our governmental institutions to the point that they are now in effect subsidiaries of multinational corporations

rampant ignorance and delusion on the part of the electorate

no free press

virtually every square inch of the country is now a coprorate landscape

net negative savings--NET NEGATIVE SAVINGS!

environmental disaster looming

rampant, legalized usury

if I weren't about to throw up, I could go on for a solid hour with all the shit that has gone horribly horribly wrong in just 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. And yet, if you're in the that upper 1%, you made greater profit than
ever - who cares if the middle class is working harder for less or that the poor got poorer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. and ridiculously so
extravagantly so

absurdly so

it's time for a revolution

I'm sick of the rich. they are the most selfish tiny slice of the population of the most selfish nation in the history of the earth

it is time for a revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, those four years following Lincoln's election
Altho, to be fair, Lincoln was a divider (divided slaveowners from their rightful property, that liberal!)

Also New York City was under military occupation by the enemy from 1776-1783.

Arguably the height of the depression (1931-1933) was a pretty dangerous time--FDR barely saved the US from fascism, as the rising powers of Huey Long on the left and Father Coughlin on the Right suggested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. FDR ended the worst of it in less than five years
but that was the last stretch even remotely this bad

the divide between the haves and the have nots--bad in America forever, but worse now--has become an unsustainable chasm. this is the stuff of a banana republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Civil War, I think.
After which, robber baron fangs were permanently stuck in the American juglar...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. the last half of the 1800's was pretty bad for most Americans,
robber barons swallowed everything within reach of their drooling maw

although there was the westward migration to give ordinary people some purpose in the scheme of things

the start of the great depression was undeniably awful--no social safety net and huge disruption for most of the population, but FDR checked it very quickly with the New Deal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Actually, not ...

Let me be clear that I am a great admirer of FDR, so this is not a criticism.

The New Deal on which FDR ran for President fixed nothing. It barely made a dent. Part of that was because of opposition he faced to, then, radical ideas such as the TVA, etc., preventing them from being implemented to their full potential, and part was because the problems were so deep seeded in the structure of the American and world economies that no quick fix was actually possible. On the last point, the Great Depression was a global depression. "Fixing it" in one place did not fix it elsewhere, which prevented it from being fixed at home. Furthermore, there were in fact several so-called "New Deals." One of FDR's great strengths was that he was not so beholden to his own ideas that he was unwilling to recognize when those ideas needed modification or complete reversal. He basically tried anything and everything he could and opened up the floor to anyone who had even the slightest hint of an idea to help, which unfortunately is how he ended up being involved with some rather unsavory characters at some points in his tenure.

What FDR did do was put in place a system with the intended effect of preventing what had happened in the late 20's from ever happening again, i.e. banking reform, agricultural reform, the social safety net, expansive educational programs, etc. -- all things Republicans have spent the last 20 years dismantling. Once the world economy had recovered from the economic collapse of the 1920's, during and in the wake of WWII, these measures fueled a renewed vigor to the economy and hastened recovery, but they did not ignite the recovery itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hoover?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. The last half of the Sixties were no party either
There was a horrible, unjustified war going on back then too. And the number of bodies coming back from that one dwarves the death toll from Iraq.

Riots. Cities burning. Assassination of political and social leaders.

Families divided---ever hear of the Generation Gap?

Yeah, these was a side to the Sixties that was about peace, love and understanding, but there was a darker side to things too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I lived (and came of age and protested) during the 60's
I believe America is more profoundly divided now than it was then, although the divide is more subtle

I do not believe the current polarization can be overcome peacefully

today, laws that came out of that era protect (or at least help to protect) the victims who felt they had to protest violently in the 60's

The "war on terror" is probably killing nearly the same number of people overall as Viet Nam, but certainly fewer of them are American military. Still, it promises to be much more insidious as it is so ill-defined, amorphous, Orwellian and directionless that it could well be a perpetual "war."

the 60's saw abuses, but never the structural, institutional attacks on the constitution and individual civil liberties that we see now.

plus, the economy now is in far worse shape structurally, with a radically greater divide between the haves and the have nots.

I could go on--yours is an apt comparison--but now I have to let my dog drag me around the park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Both parties still cared about the country then. This is much worse.
This is the Civil War all over again, except this time the South is winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Depression
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bballny Donating Member (456 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Anyone with a half a brain
would have known that this dynamic duo would fuck up. George has been a fuck up his whole life. Why would anyone think it would change. Resumes count and Bush's was a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. he is as blatant a loser as anyone whose resume I've ever seen
I wouldn't hire him to clean toilets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. in "MY" lifetime JFK 's death..and vietnam with Johnson/nixon n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. JFK's death was an awful awful time
but not five sustained years of things getting precipitously worse

BY DESIGN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. oh yes it was..JFK died and then the war excellerated..under johnson..
and more and more of my friends were getting sent to nam...and by 69 my boyfriend got sent over..and then my brothers went through draft...for my generation it was years and years and years sustained..then under nixon...each spring we sat in class listening to draft with birthdates of everyone we knew..it was a very prolonged time..

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I was in the lottery twice
I remember
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. in first lottery...
my husband got #14

my older brother got 54


my younger brother was in second lottery..he got 326

i still remember the numbers!!

fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Another Texan, I might add. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Most likely the 20s % 30s
My folks, living in California, returned to Alaska to homestead off the land (back to their roots). We were lucky. Stock market went tits up, joblessness, breadlines, people scrounging the fields for leftovers, charities were hurting. Many people with mortgages had to sell out cheap or lose their homes. The dollar bought a lot if you had the dollar to spend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-23-06 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. My Mom and her folks were Oklahoma farmers
when the Dust Bowl and then the Depression hit.

They went west and made a new life. But their stories of having literally nothing are pretty sobering. Then they turn around and get to fight WWII.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockHardCore Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. Can you footnote your claims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. what is the problem
AmeriKa has not sunk low enough for you yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. in the 1980s
under Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. We weren't hemoraging jobs
blue and white collar, under Reagan. I think this era is much worse.

btw, :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. actually, in the early 80s unemployment was far higher than now
1979 5.8
1980 7.1
1981 7.6
1982 9.7
1983 9.6
1984 7.5
1985 7.2
1986 7.0
1987 6.2
1988 5.5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Forget it, they just changed how they count. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. yes it is worse now
but for me personally the Reagan years were worse



Hi Salin --good to see you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
25. "when is the last time America had five years as bad as 2001-2005?"
I think that would be the 1st Great Depression, & I believe this is the 2nd Great Depression.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
27. 1929 - 1934?
though the Depression actually lasted until 1941.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. 1941-1945
Unless sitting around in a foxhole while artillery blasts are exploding around you is your idea of fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Outer_Limit Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-25-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
33. Most of America's history has been
extremely bad for a variety of people, this country has never been a utopia. It just that more and more people are becoming aware of how its always been for a large group of people in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC