Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Operation Rescue: SC flattens attempt to criminalize Christianity!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 08:53 PM
Original message
Operation Rescue: SC flattens attempt to criminalize Christianity!
:crazy:


Supreme Court Does It Again!

To: National Desk

Contact: Rev. Flip Benham, Operation Save America, 980-722-4920


CHARLOTTE, NC, Feb. 28 /Christian News Wire/ -- Response from Rev. Flip Benham, National Director of Operation Rescue/Save America to today's US Supreme Court decision on NOW v. Scheidler:

"In its second decision in three years, the Supreme Court of the United States of America has once again flattened the radical pro-abortion industry’s attempt to criminalize Christianity," said Rev. Flip Benham, National Director of Operation Rescue/Save America. "In another death blow, the Supremes handed the fanatics in the National Organization of Women (NOW), Planned Parenthood, and the abortion industry in general, their death certificate." Will this end their incomprehensible rage and fury against Christianity? Not hardly!

For 20 years now, they (NOW, Planned Parenthood, et. al.) have dragged gentle Christians through the mud of the media and our nation’s court system in depositions, trials, and various outrageous hearings, costing them (the Christians) millions of dollars. In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that Christians who lived out their faith at abortion mills were not racketeers. "We rejoiced!" said Rev. Benham, "But even the Supreme Court could not abate the frenzy and fierceness of the abortion industry."

NOW's trickery relied on the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, used predominantly in criminal cases against organized crime. Their attempt was to label and libel gentle Christians, living out their Christian faith at abortion mills, as racketeers!

Today, in a unanimous 8-0 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States of America ruled that federal extortion and racketeering laws cannot be used to ban Christians from living out their faith in the streets. This decision has now, and forever, declared that Christians are not racketeers!

The real purpose of NOW v. Scheidler was to tarnish the name of Jesus Christ and His image-bearers. It was a systematic attempt to paint every gentle Christian who went to an abortion clinic to save babies, as a wild-eyed lunatic bent on blowing up abortion mills and shooting abortionists. With the help of the media, the lawsuit did accomplish this purpose, but it could not stop the song. The song goes on! The True Life Giver continues on, until one day abortion will be shoved into its grave. No one will dare put a marker over it but God Himself!

http://www.earnedmedia.org/osa0228.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Gentle Christians"?
Who is this a**hole trying to kid??? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. What in the world are these people talking about?
I'm a Christian and I have never been "persecuted" against. I've been more-so for being a liberal than anything else. These people are ALWAYS playing the victim. If they aren't how else are they going to make money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a pro-abortion industry?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. As the lopsided nature of those votes suggest
this was a gross missuse of those statutes. Arresting protesters who break the law is one thing and certainly should be done. But to criminalize all the members of an organization for the actions of a few is way out of line. This tactic could easily be used against virtually any group of protesters including, but not limited to, anti war, anti NAFTA, and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. These people aren't "protesters". They're brownshirts.
They are seeking to intimidate, not protest.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. some are and some aren't
Edited on Tue Feb-28-06 09:12 PM by dsc
Would you like all protesters of corporate power to be treated like those violent anarchists since they only try to intimidate. Letting this standard be used on those you don't like is the easiest way to be sure it is used against those you do like. On edit the votes in these cases have been 8 to 1 and 8 to 0. It goes across the entire spectrum of the SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. You know, if you translated this into Farsi or Arabic...
... substituting "Mohammed" & "Allah" for "Jesus Christ" & "God" and showed it to these same people, they would laugh at it and claim that the writers were insane religious fanatics.

And they would be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Absolutely correct. I was angry until someone pointed it out to me.
It is important for us, when we want to peacefully protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have trouble taking seriously
anybody named Rev. Flip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC