Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anti-choicers are ridiculous

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:32 AM
Original message
Anti-choicers are ridiculous
They always scream about preserving life, but their socio-economic policy is horrible. If a poor child gets sick and doesn't have healthcare, they could die. Or if a child's parent loses his or her job do to Republican outsourcing, that child could go hungry. I could go on and on, but I know others here can add to this and show the hypocrisy of the anti-choice crowd. Not one anti-choicer I've seen supports universal healthcare or decent wages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Katherine Brengle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. read George Lakoff---
he explains this very, very well. It may not seem logical, but if you study the neoconservative worldview, it makes complete sense.

It's worth the ten bucks or so to get a copy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. They have no regard at all for life after birth....
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 01:42 AM by Webster Green
Unless you are an embryo, or a fetus, you are useless.

Once you are born, you are on your own.......sucker!

They will do everything in their power to make you miserable and hasten your demise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Cheap labor
Desperate parents accept slavery wages to feed thier children they cannot afford,could not abort.

The "family" has been a tool of nostagic sentamentalism to exploit humanity shacling people with thier own hearts and biology in an untenable but very profitable kind of social arragement.As has been"marriage".
Family values only serves to keep the elitists wealthy and the sentiments and nostalgia and power trip of parenthhod soothes the insecure true believer sheep.Because if daddy can't kick the boss for exploiting him he can beat his wife and kids since he fancies himself lord and"breadwinner.

The"nuclear" family is a curse upon the majority of non wealthy humanity and especially hard on children.(children grow up to be"workers" and to blame themselves for not suceeeding in a system stacked against them.. Home is where the hurt is because too often family is forced by the demands of the"job" to be an island..forced to struggle being a self reliant unit..In a worldd that is not like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep, desperate people forced to bear children
and produce minimum wage workers. All for the corporate bottom line profits. Keep them women poor, barefoot, and pregnant. Corporations love those states that will force women to bear children who will be glad to earn a wage enough to qualify them for food stamps. Walmart employees up and coming. The "New" America.

It seems like the Southern states have found their soulmates with Walmart types.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. They like life in theory, not in practice....
They love the unborn because they can speak for them without having to take responsibility for them. That's the same reason they loved Terri Schaivo--she couldn't speak for herself. Her "supporters" were free to project their own fantasies onto her, and on to her husband (the bad guy of their fantasies) as well.

These folks do not live in the real world. If they wanted to stop abortion, they would be pressuring drug companies to come up with easier, more effective forms of birth control (ever notice how primitive birth control is? Barrier methods in 2006?), and making sure every child has adequate information about sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. They threaten the woman if she has an abortion
But refuses to help in medical care or education. They don't give a damn if she was raped, or had no access to contraception. They simply don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. For many of them
the solution is adoption. If you look at the demographics of abortion in the US between 85% and 90% are preformed on healthy, young, white women who are more often than not,- middle class. What seems to be underlying this is creating a more "desirable" group of adoptable children. This is not their only reason, but I believe it is an important one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Creating a more desirable group?
What are you talking about? Are you willing to force them to carry the child against their will? Women will bear children to be adopted out?

A much better choice would be, if it was their choice, for society to help keep the mother and the child together.

Your post also leaves out any responsibility/accountability of the father.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Don't kill aznuior (sp?)
S/he was merely expressing an opinion as to the motives of the anti-choicers, not agreeing with them.

It would be far better for the mother and child to be kept together, but in many cases this is not possible (which is why the woman wants to have an abortion in the first place). If the anti-choicers truly cared about keeping them together they'd do more to support social programs that allowed mother and child to stay together. Instead they stress adoption as opposed to abortion, which is what the previous post was getting at.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. Also
There seems to be a concerted effort to first force women who "commit the sin of fornication" to first bear(?) a child they don't want to and then give women the "choice" of raising their children in poverty or giving them up--some chioce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. What I'm Talking about is fundies
are also big on adoption (gotta keep those christian soldiers coming from somewhere) and right now due to the fact that abortion is available and women that choose to have a baby are keeping those babies whether or not married the supply of adoptable children is low, If you compound that with the demographic that I pointed out, what you have is what are generally considered the most desirable children (healthy, white infants) is quite low, Maybe I should have added that there could be a racist element to the "pro-birth" movement. As far as responsibility of the fathers that doesn't come into play unless the mother decides to raise the baby herself and could a topic all it's own.
BTW why do you think they're cutting social programs? Couldn't be to make raising those babies as difficult as possible, could it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. Respectfully, I think your numbers are off
It's closer to 54 or 55% now for the total abortions had by white women. They've changed the wording of the race question now and it's more accurate as to the race. However, yes, white women are still in the majority.

Prior to the rewording it was said that it was 63 or 64% of the total abortions were had by white women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I did not re-word
I got my numbers from planned parenthoods MN site. The figures you state are world wide not US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't think they are ridiculous, but instead, ignorant
They rely on this theme of Man and Woman equals Child. And that's bullshit.

The truth is you have male sperm, plus female egg, plus WILLING WOMB, and that equals child. It ain't TWO things, it's THREE.

Now, a clever BIDNIZMAN like George Bush would tell you, that anyone holding sixty six percent of the shares in an enterprise has the deciding vote. Thus, the owner of the egg and the womb make the call. Now, that in vitro crap is another story, but I am talking plain, straight up, ninty nine percent of the time...the owner of the egg and the womb are the same soul. Thus, they have the deciding vote, owing to their greater investment.

Anything else is just bullshit. Unless and until you can implant the embryo in the male, a la ARNOLD in that tacky movie, without excessive surgical intervention that exceeds a termination, the one with the womb is the one who holds the marbles. JMO and YMMV...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Great post. Thank you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'M AN ANTI-CHOICER!
Don't lump everyone into the same ball of coal, my friend. I think abortion should be outlawed. By the same token, I am also against capital punishment. I have a reverence for life, all life. What you are saying, in your post, is that you think that those who don't believe abortion should be legal ALSO don't believe that we should have a decent healthcare system in this country, etc., etc., etc. Don't take a page out of the neo-con playbook, my friend. People think differently about the different issues. You are doing yourself, and your cause, a disservice by making these assumptions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. Anti abortion and pro death penalty...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
15. Or the "God will provide" line
Like He will reach his hand down from the heavens and put food on your table and pay your bills and medical expenses. I haven't heard that line in awhile but I still do now and then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. When a poor child gets ill
they'll "pray" for it . . . that's their "compassion" . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. You have a point but you're indulging in a Package Deal Fallacy
Not everyone who opposes abortion also opposes all progressive ideas like universal healthcare and other social safety nets. Some people simply oppose abortion on spiritual grounds, independent of any particular overall political philosophy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. I would take them more seriously if they were not so
quick to put to death these same fetuses when they grow up....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC