Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, bring Gonzales back to explain his lies and swear him in this time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:42 AM
Original message
So, bring Gonzales back to explain his lies and swear him in this time
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 09:50 AM by bigtree

Gonzales Seeks to Clarify Testimony on Spying
Extent of Eavesdropping May Go Beyond NSA Work

By Charles Babington and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, March 1, 2006; Page A08

Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales appeared to suggest yesterday that the Bush administration's warrantless domestic surveillance operations may extend beyond the outlines that the president acknowledged in mid-December.

In a letter yesterday to senators in which he asked to clarify his Feb. 6 testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, Gonzales also seemed to imply that the administration's original legal justification for the program was not as clear-cut as he indicated three weeks ago.

At that appearance, Gonzales confined his comments to the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping program, saying that President Bush had authorized it "and that is all that he has authorized."

But in yesterday's letter, Gonzales, citing that quote, wrote: "I did not and could not address . . . any other classified intelligence activities." Using the administration's term for the recently disclosed operation, he continued, "I was confining my remarks to the Terrorist Surveillance Program as described by the President, the legality of which was the subject" of the Feb. 6 hearing.

full report: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801587.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Actually he is the one that needs to be sworn in
I watch the first and he was lying through his teath. obviously lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They made it clear they won't do it.
It was a blatant in your face screw you power play. They will do it again, too. This whole gang needs to be charged with violating their oath of office or something like that when the opportunity arises. There has to be something addressing the malicious abuse of power, which, IMHO, is what we have been enduring for the past several years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. exactly, we, I guess need to just keep on rattling our rep's cages
I don't know what else to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yesterday at the Hearing, Specter swore in all the panel participants
I could only think, what a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sen. Leahy accused the WH of "running roughshod over the Constitution. . .
. . . and hiding behind inflammatory rhetoric demanding Americans blindly trust every one of its decisions."

http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200602/022806.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Here's audio of that hearing from yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC