Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers accused of ethics violations.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:09 PM
Original message
Conyers accused of ethics violations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please
Conyers???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I know. That's why I was shocked it hadn't come up in GD yet.
I had to search and then double-take. The article seems to indicate that this is old news. That's why I figured I'd ask my fellow DU'ers if they know the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's crap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, there's a wealth of information there.
:)

But seriously, is the stuff about having staffers campaign forbidden? Is politics banned from public offices entirely?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Don't know for sure
I'd have to a take a look into this first, to let you know more about it.

I would guess that it is unethical to let staffers campaign, but those bastard repuKKKes do it all the time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. DeLay sent his staffers to the Florida recount room to riot!
Fucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Oh give me a break!
DeLay indicted for money laundering.

Conyers accused of having a staffer babysit 2 kids.

Duke Cunningham takes $2 M in bribes, is convicted and awating sentencing.

Conyers is accused with not paying a staffer's gas money to get to a campaign event.

DeLay attempts to bribe a member $100,000 in exchange for a vote. Is unbraided by the ethics committee.

Conyers is accused of having a staffer who did illegal activity, was charged and convicted and received jail time.

DeLay misused the FAA, and was unbraided by the Ethics Committee.

Conyers is accused of helping his wife win a political office. This allegation was from 2002. Why did the woman who is making the charge wait until 2006?

John Boehner passes out Tobacco checks on the House floor just before a vote on a tobacco issue.

Conyers is accused of having a staffer do legal work for a private client in her office at the congressional office building.

Rooks accuses her boss of telling her what he wanted done, and my goodness, you had to do what the boss asked for. Wow! How onerous!

I agree with Alma, we have your back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Totally agreed.
I'm just wondering how bad this is on the ethical scale. Should we be concerned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. First of all, let's not be like the conservatives we criticize and dismiss
allegations out of hand just because we like a guy. Second, at most it seems he's as high handed with his staff as most other long-term politicians. There's nothing about his votes, no bribes, nothin' like that but he's gotta clean up his office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Thanks for this.
My thinking exactly.

I'm more interested in exactly what is unethical about these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was wondering when Rove would set his sights on Conyers
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. This doesn't really appear to have Rove's fingerprints on it.
Rove likes to manufacture stuff...this just looks like disgruntled former employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. It looks like we're going to learn more about our government. Civics.
Looks like we're going to learn what staffers are supposed to do and not do and on what hours and at what compensation.

I hope these people are invited on corporate propanda networks so that we can read the body language and measure their indignation.

I think we should calculate the monetary damages and take a collection.

Personally, I frequently think about how hard he works for me, for us, for the preservation of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. here is a summary of the rules governing campaigning by staff
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 02:38 PM by onenote
http://www.house.gov/ethicsreform/m_Campaign_Work_Staff.html

The following part appears to be where Conyers is alleged to have gone too far:

"As a general matter, when engaging in campaign activity, neither Members nor staff may make use of any congressional resources, including congressional office equipment, supplies, or files (including names or addresses contained in the files or official mailing lists). The rules on this point are detailed on pp. 7-20 of the Committee’s Campaign Activity booklet.

The prohibition against coercing or requiring staff member to do campaign work is broad. It forbids Members and senior staff from not only threatening or attempting to intimidate employees regarding doing campaign work, but also from directing or otherwise pressuring them to do such work. Members and superiors in a congressional office should be cautious in asking a staff member to do campaign work, as a request from a superior may be misunderstood to be an order."



onenote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. That reminds me - do you remember the FL door-pounders -
young punks who descended on Dade Co and pounded on the door as if they were Dade residents demanding that the vote be stopped? Weren't some of them staffers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yes - all of them. Plus they were flown there on airplanes
belonging to Enron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Agreed.
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 02:53 PM by tasteblind
It would be nice to know where this ranks with the rest of the ethics violations going on in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC