Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Utter Temptation of Being Always Right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
hyphenate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:36 PM
Original message
The Utter Temptation of Being Always Right
Over the past couple of weeks I've managed to have a smile come to my face with some of the stories told about republicans and their antics out in the wide, wide world. We have managed to keep some scandals alive, showing the congress people and the regime and their hand in different pots, we have managed to find amusement in Dick Cheney nearly blowing someone's head off, and most of all, the poll numbers are now reflecting what should have been obvious to most people sometime three years ago or so. It's beginning to look really rough for this group of hooligans, but truth be told, we are in no position to feel smug.

Let us examine the situation as it stands now. The country is pretty pissed off at Bush and regime for the ports deal with Dubai; more details on the Abramoff scandal are coming out, making almost every high powered republican look suspiciously guilty by association; we have some satisfaction in naming Scooter Libby as one of many (someday to be named) conspirators against Valerie Plame; we have a scathing report out on the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina which makes DHS and FEMA look like a rerun of the Keystone Cops; and we have at least the makings of another 10 or more scandals country and world-wide that have further potential to make this presidency the most degraded, most guilty, most corrupt regime ever faced by the American people. Even Richard Nixon's scandals paled in comparison to some of the current affairs, and Iran-Contra now seems like something plotted by first-graders.

But let's face it, folks--if we think we're done, then we need to quit and never talk politics again. Because it's not over, nor are we even close to any sort of real victory.

It's 2006. This fall, we will be faced with the prospect that a newly elected congress will consist of more Democrats than Republicans. If this happens, yay. If this doesn't happen, we will likely wonder if we are truly out of step with the overall mood of our native country, or we will wonder how blind we really are. But the main thrust of the November elections lies in our own level of complacency: if we stop, even for a moment, from attacking this current regime on anything other than the facts, we will lose, and we will lose permanently.

The Republicans have managed, somehow, to keep their finger on the pulse of our country in a way that we can not or can't understand. They appeal to the people on an emotional level. They take chances that most of us think ludicrous, but which, by some small miracle, works for them. They manage to get deep into the heart of Americans, find their fears and mirror those fears right back to the people, enabling them to manipulate far better than Dr. Frankenstein ever did the Beast.

They did it with Bill Clinton, making a blowjob and single "lie" an impeachable offense. They made it out to appear that the man was a rapist or worse, and that having a sexual rendezvous in the white house was akin to Hitler exterminating the Jews. They did it to Al Gore, by making people think that he was too "brainy", too cerebral, too imposing. They made it seem that electing Gore was going to result in a country of uncaring zombies whose sole goal in life was to make sure that Jesus went unworshipped. They did it to John Kerry, by making his noble sacrifice in Vietnam look like a holiday for a rich man, who accumulated Purple Hearts through false pretenses. They made those who sat out the war--Cheney, Bush, Limbaugh--look positively patriotic by working "at home" to save their country. Yes, folks, Karl Rove is a spin genius, when he can take everything negative about republicans and turn them into stunning jewels of modesty and patriotism.

The Republican party is a unified one. Yes, they are vastly comprised of rich white men, but they are also comprised of scared or intolerant poor people, whose only fear is that someone lower on the social scale than they are will be given more than what they have. There are poor people who don't understand that their own choices are what keeps them poor, or ignorant, or undereducated. They don't realize that the Democrats are the party of inclusion, because they have been taught that Democrats are only out to make our country a "socialized" one, filled with communists, anti-gun protesters, powerful blacks or homosexuals, atheists, agnostics and feminazis. They have been grilled since their birth to believe that Democrats will take everything they own (regardless of how little that is) and give it to someone else. They have been initiated into a club of hatred which has never once failed to keep prejudice alive and well and living in the United States of America.

We are faced with situations far more grave than what we have previously imagined: that hatred and intolerance are currently part of the backbone of our country, and it will take a very long time before we can convince a lot of these people that we aren't the enemy!

It's why Pat Robertson can get away with whatever he wishes to say. It's why this regime has managed to push the edge of the envelope so far out that we are left reeling and confused. It's why a single, non-threatening lie brought impeachment, and scores of outright deceptions brought--nothing.

We also must understand that the nearly three years ahead of us are filled with a great deal of horror, regardless of what happens in November of this year. We seek impeachment of both the President and the Vice-President. Then......what? Do we really think our choices ahead are any better than these two? Here is the current list of successors to the white house in case we are "so lucky" to be able to get rid of Bush and Cheney:

This is a list of the current presidential line of succession, as specified by the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (3 U.S.C. § 19).

Dick Cheney, Vice President
J. Dennis Hastert, Speaker of the House of Representatives
Ted Stevens, President pro tempore of the Senate
Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of State
John W. Snow, Secretary of the Treasury
Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense
Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General
Gale Norton, Secretary of the Interior
Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture
Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Commerce (ineligible due to birth outside U.S.)
Elaine Chao, Secretary of Labor (ineligible due to birth outside U.S.)
Michael Leavitt, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Alphonso Jackson, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation
Samuel W. Bodman, Secretary of Energy
Margaret Spellings, Secretary of Education
Jim Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

This is courtesy of Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_succession_to_the_US_presidency


So....Dennis Hastert? Condi? Ted Stevens? No matter what we do, we're screwed.

I hesitate to say this, but while I know we are right, we must try to figure out what we need to do in order to keep our country intact, and if that means swallowing our truths and pride, than so be it. We have lined our government with crooks, liars and dirty souls, and we can blame no one nut ourselves for letting it come to this. Too often the quote: “All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing” seems to apply--for if we continually spoke up from January, 2001 until now, perhaps we would have faced a less staggering task. The problem was that in those years immediately after the 2000 election, we found ourselves in the uncomfortable position of being silenced by many factors, including trying to be as unlike the Repubs as possible. This made us look weak, and our resolve to find common grounds was more powerful than our distrust of all things Republican. Once 9/11 came and left us in shock, we had no choice but to get behind the regime and stand together against terrorism. Too many events brought our brooding silence to a point where outright dissent was never going to happen. The people of our country were blackmailed emotionally into an untenuous state of confusion and extended fear. Like Pavlov's dogs, when the color turned red, we were scared. Like Pavlov's dogs, we exchanged our pride and honor for security and camaraderie.

So now, while it is tempting to want to point out how right we were--and still are, it is impossible for us to really do so. Because once we feed our sense of outrage, we are faced with far more grim alternatives, which will continue to exist for at least three more years--1055 days until another president can be inaugurated. There is no hope on the horizon that we can change things from the way they are. We must try to turn the negative connotations of being Democrats into positive ones before we can convince a large portion of our citizenship to become part of something resembling a more compassionate force; we must use emotion--as well as reason--to show people that we are not the enemy; we must show our people that the lies which got us to where we are today begin and end with the opposing party; but above all, we must make our country's citizens use self-examination as to why they feel the repubs are somehow better than we are. We must make them question their own levels of charity, of tolerance, of hatred and beliefs. If we can not do that, we are going nowhere. And while we might want to revel in the shining glow of truth and virtue, it isn't going to get other people to change or even get them to trust us any more than they already do--which is not at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. "No matter what we do, we're screwed??" Thanks for that Progressive hope.
Last time I looked, President Pelosi falls next in line behind an IMPEACHED Bush** and Cheney**.

Remember - 16+5=2006

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. By the way, it may be all about "me-me-me" on other message boards...
...but here it's not about BEING right. It's about DOING what's right.

16+5=2006

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiraboo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. But I think you have hit upon the heart of our dilemma.
In order to oust the neocons, we must equal them in deception, misleadership and corruption. It is terribly clear to me that somehow bush's base is not inspired by either truth or reality or morality or patriotism or love of mankind or any other value liberals hold dear. And when I describe bush's base, I include much of our democratic leadership, for obvious reasons. So in the short term I find it hard to argue that we are not indeed screwed no matter what we do. I don't blame our lack of cohesiveness, our differences. Instead I "blame" our shared integrity and respect for all human beings. We cannot stoop to the level of the neocon. We do not believe that the ends justify the means if the means are reprehensible to us.

I have no answers. It is remarkably depressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It actually wouldn't matter, at this point, whether we stoop to the
Edited on Wed Mar-01-06 08:10 PM by Nay
neocon's level or not -- because even if we win the elections in 2006 and 2008, we will never be able to undo the financial damage done to this country by the neocons' work of the last 30 years -- whether they were in office or not.

There is no undoing the yawning debt, the shuttered companies, the blasted infrastructure. It cannot be undone, and it cannot be "fixed" in the sense of, say, the U.S. people getting together and fixing it. The wrench has been thrown into the economic works, and the gears will soon seize. There is no going back from this, no pulling away from the edge. They have forced the country to jump off the cliff, and the only reason we don't know it is that we haven't hit the bottom yet.

The damage done to 3rd world countries as described in "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" has been done to us, and nearly all of us here on this board will be dead before any semblance of normalcy will come around again.

Hate to be such a downer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiraboo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I think that, secretly, you like being a downer!
Just kidding. Personally, I tend to agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well one thing if Democrats take control of Congress Hastert will not be
third in line, nor will Senator Stevens. There will be a Democratic Speaker and Byrd would be ranking Senator. The only glitch would be Condi but I don't think she would get very damn far with any agenda with a Democratic Congress, She would be a Lame Duck from day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddzimm Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Consider for a moment that the Republicans get their messages out
like they are selling a product, like commercials. They run their political campaigns like ad campaigns. Regardless of the validity of the content, their messages, the sound bites the mainstream media pick up, are fifteen to thirty seconds. They craft their messages to appeal to the main method of communication available to the (passive) masses, TV.

Now, consider this for the moment: When Kerry’s war issue hit the mainstream, where was Kerry’s reply “I served, did you?”

When the Brainless Leader switched his war justification from WMDs to Freeing Iraq, where was the Democratic message “Where’s the WMD’s, Mr. President!”

Where are the “Ask not what you can do…” and “I have a dream…” moments that stand your hair on end and send shivers down your spine, that make you BELEVE, not logically conclude, but BELEVE in the truth of the message?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC