It is so sad that our party is afflicted with a name bearing such disgusting fascist appeal, for it merely defines the tyranny of the majority.In fact, it is hardly something that any true American democrat of today actually stands for!
Our forefathers gave us a multi-representative, publicly guided (republican) form of Unified central governance, balanced by the equal partnership of justice, States and population under the supreme anointed power of a Paper Monarch of Liberty, whose indomitable enacted will and guidance guaranteed to all; their forms of governance, inherent human rights, specific individual liberties, and the rights of their Federal and State localities.
America was nation of immigrants who had come to the New World to free themselves from religious persecution by either Imperial Anglican Fascist(Tory) or Roman Catholic Fascist(Cavalier) Racist, Eugenic, Noble Monarchist Tyranny (tribal mafia warlords). Even under more egalitarian Whig 'democracy' parliamentary parties were still licensed to capitalize upon and establish majority sectarian socialisms, like those of Anglicanism(Tory) Roman Catholicism, or Puritanism who's taboos were so easily enactable by wink and a nod among privileged noble socialist church proselytizers and easily exploited populist mob-voter Conservatism. In Europe anyone who was not Catholic or Anglican was discriminated against, persecuted and oppressed ruthlessly.
"morality can be maintained without religion." George Washington
Implicit uppermost in the Constitutions Bill of Rights was the right of all minorities to be free of the repressive, persecutory dogmatic tyranny of established religious socialist majorities. However, one loyal duty to Liberty Itself anointed by a God of Love Itself, is the calling of the true American Patriot and Republican Liberal."I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between church and State." -- Thomas Jefferson
At it's basis, our anointed Constitution of Republican Liberty restricts religious forms of socialism from establishing their special interest mores, privileges and/or dogmatic tyrannies above or beyond those of any other comparably special social interest group.
"As the union between spiritual freedom and political liberty seems nearly inseparable, it is our duty to defend both. And defence in the FIRST INSTANCE is best." Thomas Paine, Thoughts on Defensive War - 1775
As Thomas Paine said, support your neighbors right to pray up a tree in the nude, but avoid thinking that some sort of political law about prayer will ever modify such a disagreement if you value your own Liberty.
Three corollaries exist within; both the political 'comparability' and the minor socialist 'diversities' of the conflicting or aligning religious socialisms, and the willingness of stacked courts to limit mob populism when 'democracy' establishes a widely held socialist dogma into an established fascist tyranny, which deprives others of their equivalent individual rights.
"Today Christians rule Germany! I pledge that I never will tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity .. We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit ... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theater, and in the press - in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess..." - *The Speeches of Adolph Hitler, 1922-1939, Vol. 1 (London, Oxford University Press, 1942)
It also from time to time should appear incumbent upon moderates of all religious socialist 'faiths' to willfully disenfranchise dangerous and destructive intolerant fundamentalists from hijacking a generic "non-sectarian" coalition like "Judeo-Christianism" in order to establish a fascist tyranny, by combining and enfranchising hate mongering, oppressive splinters of numerically powerful Religious or Marxist dogmatic socialist 'special interest' groups.
"Religion must be declared a private affair. In these words socialists usually express their attitude towards religion. But the meaning of these words should be accurately defined to prevent any misunderstanding. We demand that religion be held a private affair so far as the state is concerned. But by no means can we consider religion a private affair so far as our Party is concerned.
Religion must be of no concern to the state, and religious societies must have no connection with governmental authority. Everyone must be absolutely free to profess any religion he pleases, or no religion whatever, i.e., to be an atheist, which every socialist is, as a rule. Discrimination among citizens on account of their religious convictions is wholly intolerable.
Our Programme is based entirely on the scientific, and moreover the materialist, world-outlook. An explanation of our Programme, therefore, necessarily includes an explanation of the true historical and economic roots of the religious fog. Our propaganda necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism; the publication of the appropriate scientific literature, which the autocratic feudal government has hitherto strictly forbidden and persecuted, must now form one of the fields of our Party work." - V. I. Lenin *Socialism and Religion
Note how he uses the misdirection of 'religious societies', this was essential to steal the humanistic associative term 'socialism' for Marxist Workers Socialism alone. This in fact was a total denial of both the materialism they dreamt of and scientific political reality! Lenin, like Marx, sought to rationalize an illusory wall between their supposedly unique 'materialist' world of dogmatic workers 'socialism' by dismissing the most prominent, competitive and powerful established forms of religious 'socialism' as being merely idealistic private notions, rather than recognizing them as also being a systematic body of socialist dogmatism rooted in the special 'socialist' interests of the noble elitist exploiters they lived in curious timid denial of their fear of.
OK, so what is the problem when the so-called 'Democratic Party' is actually the party of Republican Liberty and so-called 'National Republican Party' is actually an Imperial Tory Conservative Christian Socialist Party? It's called misdirection.
We should rename our party the Liberty Party because that is our true core belief!In fact 'republicanism' merely means any form of pseudo-democratic non-monarchy, yet tribal mafia warlords (like Saddam) are not precluded from abusing it. Rome under a God-Emperor considered itself a republic. Marxist Fascist Russia was still an Imperial Republic, Afghanistan under the Taliban was an Imperial Muslim Fascist Republic, Israel is an Imperial Jewish Fascist republic. Aside from having a racist-eugenic tribal mafia 'monarch' who is also a pseudo-Pope, the established-Anglican Fascists of Britain, using a supposedly somewhat liberal 'democratic Parliament' might also easily fit the bill.
The threat that exists within every mighty socialist organization embodying a dogmatic set of notions in this world lies in the religious fervor and intolerance with which, once established politically and militarily, and fanatically convinced of its own right, it intolerantly imposes its now-fascist will against all others. Liberty and Liberalism alone is inherently free of this subversive tendency toward the totalitarian tyranny of established dogmatic socialist fascism.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
