Are Bill O'Reilly's Followers Behind The Hacking Of Progressive Forums?

[Wafture]

Since the "Keith Oberman" incident, progressive forums that were lambasting O'Reilly have been hacked. Has anyone else noticed this? What is going on?

For example, anti-O'Reilly discussions at these two forums seem to have been corrupted:

http://69.73.163.60/oreillysucks/index.php

http://www.angryintheusa.com/forum

There seems to be a war on free speech on the internets. How are these right-wing terists able to get away with it????

Anyone else aware this is going on?


:wtf:


edit: I just went to http://www.democrats08.com/forum/ and ALL the messages (except for a test post from back in October 2000) are GONE!

What on earth???

[Democrats_win]

1. It's hard to imagine anyone would waste time defending that loser.

[Wafture]

3. This is really terrible

Is this what we can expect, now that Bush and his gang are going down, they're resorting to sabotage?

[Random_Australian]

2. No. It isn't. His followers sound pretty rabid to me n/t

[0007]

4. Forum link can't be found.

http://www.angryintheusa.com/forum

[noamnety]

5. What's with the weird prefix on oreillysucks?

http://www.oreillysucks/index.php seems to work just fine for me, as does the link on their home page that goes to their forum: http://forum.onecenter.com/stewert/

[Faygo Kid]

7. Doesn't work for me. Uh-oh.

Correct the address for me if it's wrong.

[Wafture]

8. that's their old message board from 2004

For the past two years they've had a different board. But today, a black screen comes on saying site was hacked by REAXION.

[Faygo Kid]

6. Limbaugh has worshippers. But O'Reilly? He wishes. Maybe hired.

There are probably two or three out there, but I think this raises an interesting question: As nuts and egotistical as he is, could he be paying people to post? He certainly has the wealth, and now that we know he threatens people the least bit critical of him (just mentioning Olbermann), I wouldn't put it past him. O'Reilly will be a wealthy addition to the Funny Farm; that's clearly where he is going, unless he is convicted of sexual harassment first.

[Wafture]

9. It can't be a coincidence that all three sites just happened to be hacked

this week, the week Bush dropped to 34% and O'Reilly threatened Keith's listeners.

[Faygo Kid]

12. Yes, you are right. I saw it, too. O'Reilly is crushing critical sites.

Coincidence that sites critical of O'Reilly aren't working? I don't think so. Nor do you. But what fun it will be to come back at him this coming week. Thank you, my friend.

[Ignacio Upton]

10. It was "Fox Security"

:scared: :eyes: :silly:

[Wafture]

13. I was thinking the same thing ... FOX SECURITY

I had never heard that term before until O'Reilly threatened callers.

[bullwinkle428]

11. O'Reilly listeners/viewers couldn't even turn on a PC without help,

let alone hack a website!

[walldude]

14. LMAO.. my thoughts exactly

In order to be a decent hacker you have to be able to read. Somehow I doubt Billy's audience does much reading...

[tom_paine]

15. Unquestionably the Brownshirts are behind it

(naturally, at least on the hack I looked at, it was attributed to Muslim Turks, much as Bushevik Susan Smith, deeply and repeatedly molesetd for decades by her Bushevik father, accused "unidentified black males" of murdering the children she murdered.

One day, I prophesy, a much stronger Liberal Internet Kristallnacht will occur. When that day happens, get ready, for the implications will be the same as when the first kristallnacht happened.

What it means: The REAL agenda of Leader and Homeland is about to get underway.

PS These scattered O'Reichley hacks are NOT it. But be ready when it happens aqnd understand the meanings.

Because if the Brownshirts and Stormtroopers get the drop on you, you ain't going to nowhere except Halliburton Homeland Detention camp.

[Wafture]

17. O'Reichley hacks

"PS These scattered O'Reichley hacks are NOT it. But be ready when it happens aqnd understand the meanings."

I think it's already begun.

IMHO

[Generic Other]

16. I'm confused. Why would Ottoman Turks deface an anti-BO site?

Too subtle for me. Makes no sense.