Iran's Best Friend (NYT EDIT)

[kpete]

Iran's Best Friend

Published: March 5, 2006

.....................

There is now a real risk that Iraq, instead of being turned into an outpost of secular democracy challenging the fanatical rulers of the Islamic republic to its east, could become an Iranian-aligned fundamentalist theocracy, challenging the secular Arab regimes to its west.

Fast-forward to Thursday's nuclear deal with India, in which President Bush agreed to share civilian nuclear technology with India despite its nuclear weapons programs and its refusal to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.

This would be a bad idea at any time, rewarding India for flouting the basic international understanding that has successfully discouraged other countries from South Korea to Saudi Arabia from embarking on their own efforts to build nuclear weapons. But it also undermines attempts to rein in Iran, whose nuclear program is progressing fast and unnerving both its neighbors and the West.

The India deal is exactly the wrong message to send right now, just days before Washington and its European allies will be asking the International Atomic Energy Agency to refer Iran's case to the United Nations Security Council for further action. Iran's hopes of preventing this depend on convincing the rest of the world that the West is guilty of a double standard on nuclear issues. Mr. Bush might as well have tied a pretty red bow around his India nuclear deal and mailed it as a gift to Tehran.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/05/opinion/05sun1.html?hp

[Cooley Hurd]

1. K&R - they always seem to do the oppposite of what's best for the US...

:crazy:

[ChairmanAgnostic]

2. I said it before, if with every choice, America had done the opposite

compared to what the Bushistas did, we would be a much safer, happier, freer and more prosperous nation.

[moondust]

3. Another reason why

the Pukes have no business trying to conduct U.S. foreign policy. They are again blind to the implications of their monumental mistakes.