Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AMT could trip up 21 million next year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 03:56 PM
Original message
AMT could trip up 21 million next year
AMT could trip up 21 million next year

Alternative minimum tax ensnares middle class, big families

By Mark Schwanhausser
KNIGHT RIDDER NEWS SERVICE

March 5, 2006

Here's what politicians don't say when they boast about cutting income taxes. Every trim forces more Americans to pay the dreaded alternative minimum tax instead.

“It is the great American bait and switch,” said Claudia Hill, owner of a Cupertino tax-preparation firm and editor-in-chief of the Journal of Tax Practice & Procedures. “They say, 'We're going to give you tax breaks' – and then you find out you don't qualify.”

This parallel tax system was created 37 years ago to take away tax breaks from about 150 wealthy taxpayers who had piled up write-offs to erase their tax bills. Chances are, it seems irrelevant if you aren't among the 4 million taxpayers who owe it for 2005. But give it time – a year, to be exact. These days you don't have to be rich for the AMT to wipe out your write-offs.

Though most of them are unaware, 21 million Americans are on the hook to pay the AMT next tax season barring congressional intervention. Some experts predict lawmakers will restore an expired tax provision that had slowed the AMT's spread through 2005. If they don't, there will be a fivefold increase in the number of taxpayers who will owe what one prominent U.S. senator calls the “Darth Vader of the tax code.”

The AMT's dark side is that its burden increasingly will be borne by middle-class taxpayers by intensifying the “marriage penalty,” biting big families harder, erasing itemized deductions and shrinking breaks related to kids. In 2006, a family of four will step into the AMT quicksand once its adjusted gross income exceeds $67,500 – by claiming the standard deduction and four personal exemptions, the Congressional Budget Office says.

(snip)


Find this article at:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20060305/news_lz1b5amt.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very interesting. Maybe it won't happen.
Edited on Sun Mar-05-06 04:07 PM by NYC
...Some experts predict lawmakers will restore an expired tax provision that had slowed the AMT's spread through 2005. If they don't, there will be a fivefold increase in the number of taxpayers who will owe what one prominent U.S. senator calls the “Darth Vader of the tax code.”

Maybe this won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. This could be the Democrats tax issue if they make something of it
That would be the Democratic tax plan:

Raise the AMT tax limit and junk the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. It can't lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapodem Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Senator Menendez
has said he is making this an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC