Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Listening to Mark Levine. Dems have no voice because they

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:34 PM
Original message
Listening to Mark Levine. Dems have no voice because they
are not in power in any branch. It's those in power who have the ear of the media. Dems do have ideas and an agenda, but you simply don't hear about it.


I happen to think he's right, but if he is...WHY?

Isn't the MSM supposed to cover all stories? All sides? Has it always been like this? My problem is, I can't remember when any one single Party controlled all three branches of Gov't, so maybe it was the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's see
listen to Mark Levin or shove a porcupine up my ass? I choose the porcupine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Two different people, I think...
16+5=2006

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. If the M were truly MS, yes... BUT THEY'RE NOT "MAINSTREAM!!"
They're the Corporate Media, and their goal is to advance the Corporate Agenda - unlimited power and profit.

Please don't call them "the MSM." It just encourages them.

16+5=2006

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. what the fuck is 16+5=2006?
you're making me feel like an old person who doesn't know the meaning of "sup."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's the number of house and senate seats it will take to
regain control of both houses of Congress in 2006.

15 House seats and 5 Seante Seats.

Don't be worried. I actually had to think about it for a while before I realized what it meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yeah, kind of caught on to that late, wasn't too sure though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. when democrats are in the media
by and large it is the usual DLC crew, Lieberman, Hillary, Biden etc. Thank God we had a few minutes of Rep. Murtha and his stark truth on FTN this morning. That is rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. No, it has not always been like this
Twenty years ago, we had the Fairness Doctrine, which required newcasts to show different sides to an issue. But this was repealed because with the advent of cable, it was said, all viewpoints would be given a chance to be heard. Of course, that hasn't happened; most media is controlled by a few corporations, and they require that their stations toe the company line for the most part.

I'm old enough to remember when Democrats controlled all three branches of government. They did not work in lockstep-Congress would fight the President when they thought he was overreaching, and the SCOTUS defended the rights of individuals. Plus they were courteious to the Republicans, actually letting sit in on conference committee meetings about laws (and no lobbyists were there).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I doubt you are older than I am. I guess I just wasn't paying much
attention to Gov't. I know I've heard a lot about how the Senate was always congenial to each other. They'd fight on the Senate floor and then have a beer together later.

I guess the big change happened when Nixon was kicked out. Some Pubs still haven't forgotten that. They're looking for payback!

I wonder if we will EVER see the day when Congress and the Senate actually works for the American People's best interests instead of the destructive partisanship of today? The only members who seem to still have at least some of that are the very old members, and soon they will be gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. They were congenial long after Nixon
I remember Reagan and Tip O'Neil drinking beer together (two Irishmen). I think the end to civility started when Newt Gingrich was in the House. He's the one who made "liberal" a dirty word.

The demise of the media (and the Fairness Doctrine) began when Reagan was president and was finished off by Clinton (one of the worst things he did).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Do you think we can ever bring the Fairness doctrine back? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. It'd be worth a try
I think if we do control the House and Senate and can get a democratic president we could possibly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. I think it would be VERY hard, but I also think it would be the single
most important factor in getting rid of the fascism that has invaded our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Don't know your age
but I've been fascinated with politics since the 1960 debates. The Republicans used to have a club called the Chowder and Marching Society, where they'd meet and discuss strategy. This was where they came up with the Eleventh Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican. At the time, since they were so outnumbered, it made sense to stick together, and to believe that the party leaders had the best intentions in helping the party. Part of the problem with Republicans today is that they still have the Chowder mindset, and they don't dare speak out against their leaders. The Dems, on the other hand, have always been a rowdy bunch, with leaders never assured that everyone would agree with them. Remember Will Rogers once said he didn't belong to an organized political party, he was a Democrat. I think that even back in the heady days of 1933 there were Democrats in the House and Senate that had their own ideas of how to do things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. It seems like a far away dream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. corporations are now a branch of the government
the msms are corporations.

corporations are not going to work against the current status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. when the dems were in power, we still only heard one side
some warp has been put into the system, going back to the jfk/rfk/mlk/malcomx murder era, and it is so vast, so psyche, that we can't see it, can't even talk about it.....the newsmedia remains almost seamlessly devoted to lying (notice during the tsunami that the more then 3000 american victims received NO MEDIA? if we could answer why, then we would identify what it is that is ruining this most vital element of democracy)...even after bush resigns, or quits due to cancer, or whatever other trick the gopigs come up with, our society will be controlled by men who's lives and fortunes depend upon maintaining a state of affairs that degrades the whole
BTW such a political force as liberalism, easily representing the majority of the citizens, still SEEM powerless, as if daschle and feinstein and lieberman or even john kerry or al gore or bill clinton speak for it! It took 30 years of behind the scenes fukking around and schemeing to get to this state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Dems act like the minority instead of the opposition.
For the most part. With a few notable exceptions. They remind me of Oliver Twist asking for more at dinner. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. The media is in control of a few people
who like the GOP because they get richer. So of course they're going to follow them more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC