Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Moving Into The COVER-UP Phase-Potential Danger for Admin- Glenn Greenwald

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:28 AM
Original message
Moving Into The COVER-UP Phase-Potential Danger for Admin- Glenn Greenwald
Tuesday, March 07, 2006
Moving into the cover-up phase

One of the bizarre rules of Washington scandals is that severe wrongdoing, including law-breaking, is insufficient to sustain interest or to warrant real accountability. The wrongdoing has to be accompanied by subsequent deceit designed to conceal the wrongdoing, and then everyone gets excited. Put another way, a Washington scandal has not arrived until there is a cover-up component to it.

That is why I thought the letter from Alberto Gonazles to the Senate Judiciary Committee last week was so significant. Gonazles had many weeks to prepare for his testimony and, unlike most witnesses who testify in judicial proceedings, was free to speak for as long as he wanted without ever being interrupted or cut off by his questioners. The fact that he had to issue a 6-page single-spaced letter "clarifying" his testimony only a couple of weeks after he testified -- in which he literally retracted some of the most significant answers he gave and provided brand new, conflicting ones -- makes clear that Gonazles arrived at the Committee prepared to mislead it by concealing the Administration's actions.

This AP article from yesterday (h/t Edward Copeland) reports on a very interesting development in this regard:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060307/ap_on_go_co/eavesdropping


Having Gonzales called back before the Committee in order to explain the glaring discrepancies between his testimony and his subsequent "on-second-thought" letter can endow the scandal with an even greater whiff of deceit and cover-up. And the fact that one of the topics in which the Judiciary Committee members are interested is the issue of whether there are other warrantless eavesdropping programs in existence greatly heightens the potential danger for the Administration.

http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/03/moving-into-cover-up-phase.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. suggestion in his letter (of) other classified intelligence programs"
hah!

That's how lies are uncoverd...get them to say TOO MUCH!

waiting with sad anticipation for the next inevitable step...


Thanks Sen Arlen Specter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Arlen was the one who made a big thing out of NOT swearing
the little Liar in last time. He had to make it into a partisan fight out of it & he thought it was real cute to do so. This in my mind is a direct consequence of allowing Gonzales to be unsworn or did he know Alberto was going to lie his ass off?

Lets see if they swear him this time. Any wagers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. No frigging way they swear him in. Arlen is every much a part of the cover
up. He knows that he can't swear in Alberto because he knows Alberto has to have the latitude to lie his arse off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Greenwald rules.
THere's no better source out there for material on the NSA scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's time to use the Gingrich MO and memorize these words
http://thesaurus.reference.com/search?q=mislead

<snip>
Main Entry: con
Part of Speech: verb
Definition: deceive
Synonyms: bamboozle, bilk, cajole, cheat, chicane, coax, defraud, double-cross, dupe, flimflam, fool, hoax, hoodwink, hornswoggle, humbug, inveigle, mislead, rip off, rook, sweet-talk, swindle, trick
Antonyms: be forthright, be honest, enlighten, inform
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC