Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean: America's Security Should Be America's Business

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 06:33 PM
Original message
Dean: America's Security Should Be America's Business
Dean: America's Security Should Be America's Business; Chertoff Statement is Example of Administration's Incompetence on Security

3/7/2006 2:19:00 PM
WASHINGTON, March 7 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The following was released today by the Democratic National Committee:

In an article published today in the Wall Street Journal, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff made the outrageous claim that the controversial deal to allow a foreign government- owned company to manage six of our nation's largest ports would actually enhance America's security. Chertoff's statement raises new questions about the ports deal and why the U.S. government has to negotiate with a foreign company in order to thoroughly scrutinize operations on American soil. These comments come as Americans are learning that "overseas-based companies operate as many as 80 percent of American terminals." (Bloomberg, 2/28/06)

According to the article, "federal law-enforcement and intelligence agencies have been trying to get inside information about global shipping operations" since September 11, 2001, and Chertoff argues that turning over the management of some of our nation's busiest seaports would give the government "a deep look into" the practices of the foreign government-owned company's operations at "the U.S. ports." (Wall Street Journal, 3/7/06)

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean issued the following statement:


"America's security should be America's business. The unbelievable claim that we need this deal to gain better insight into what happens at our own ports is not only laughable but another example of the Republican leadership's failure to keep us safe. The Bush Administration and the Department of Homeland Security shouldn't be waiting for public outrage before looking at potential threats to the American people. Gaining allies in the war on terror shouldn't require the outsourcing of America's ports nor handing over the security of the American people to foreign governments. Five years after 9/11, Republicans in Washington have done nothing to make our ports less vulnerable and have thwarted Democrats' efforts to increase funds for port security. Democrats will continue to fight to close the gaps in our nation's port security, and ensure that those responsible for keeping America safe are doing their jobs."



Paid for and authorized by the Democratic National Committee, http://www.democrats.org. This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

http://www.usnewswire.com/
http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=61962
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Swede Atlanta Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good Grief
They are so out of touch with reality. Now they are trying to justify the ports deal as some kind of intelligence initiative to learn more about how foreign governments use their front companies to run our ports? They are grasping at straws now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC