Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good News; Bad News, from Conyers' Blog:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:21 PM
Original message
Good News; Bad News, from Conyers' Blog:
http://www.conyersblog.us/archives/00000396.htm

Good News; Bad News
Impeachment Gains Traction; Patriot Passes in the House

First the good news. C-span is showing the Harper's Magazine Forum on Impeachment in New York I discussed a few days ago. You can see an archived version by clicking here, and going to C-span 2, for 7:45 AM. I can tell you that a lot of folks have already seen it, and I received a number of calls and commendations regarding the forum already. On a related note, I see that Newfane, Vermont has passed a resolution calling for impeachment as well. This shows that there is real interest in the grass roots for accountability. Kudos to Newfane.

Now the bad news. Today the House approved, by only 2 votes, the so-called Patriot Act "fixes" approved by the Senate last week. This was a controversial bill, and should never have been on the House suspension calendar. The fixes were either largely cosmetic or downright negative, from a civil liberties point of view. We fought this abuse of power every step of the way and I controlled time on the Democratic side today. I am proud of the way the many, many opponents spoke out and spoke up today -- I just wish we had three more votes. I can assure you, civil rights and liberties is an issue that will not go away, even with today's defeat.

Blogged by JC on 03.07.06 @ 08:03 PM ET <6 Comments>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. They only needed three more votes to defeat the bill??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. These close votes are contrived
because certain Republicans are allowed to vote against in the interest of upcoming elections. Its a managed vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Such bullshit, isn't it. Why does anyone bother? I'm not
a pessimist, but I can get discouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. They are getting there "duck in a row" for the Democatic House. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC