Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Self defense and non violence

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
undergroundpanther Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:29 AM
Original message
Self defense and non violence

Gandhi justified his view, "Any injustice on our land, any encroachment on our land should be defended by violence, if not by non-violence... If you can defend by non-violence, by all means do it; that is the first thing I should like. If it is for me to do, I would not touch anything, either a pistol or revolver or anything. But I would not see India degrading itself to be feeling helpless." ('Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel: India's Iron Man', B Krishna, Harper Collins India, 1996.)

But whatever exception Gandhi may have considered allowable to nations and individuals in the matter of self defence, he was himself, of course, a committed and unwavering adherent of ahimsa. He died by an assassin's bullet because he considered having a bodyguard as condoning violence for one's personal safety. The point I am trying to make here is that though Gandhi was himself unwaveringly committed to his non-violent ideology he did not allow it to blind him to reality, nor lead him into dishonesty in its propagation. He did not hesitate to state that recourse to violence was not something that could be entirely avoided in the course of human affairs

http://www.timesoftibet.com/articles/151/1/Non-Violence-and-Non-Action

http://members.aol.com/ScottH9999/essays/Gandhi.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-08-06 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Aye, true.
The path past injustice is held in the brain.

If the information is randomised the cause is lost. Though it probly sounded like I meant the opposite in that GD post that started this (I'm fairly sure it was me as it would be a v. big co-incidence)

However, violence solves no problems. We use it to change the form of the problem.I'm not sure, but it appears to mimic entropy in that it does not reduce the problem, but may increase it, when it changes form, but seeing as we are humans with free will it is *technically* possible for us to not do so...

All the same I should be careful with violence, and make clear the reasons for using it. Self Defense is all the justification you need, but don't become pre-emptive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC