Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House votes to strip food warning labels, overturn up to 200 safety laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:48 AM
Original message
House votes to strip food warning labels, overturn up to 200 safety laws
More outrageous antics from the worst congress ever.....


WASHINGTON - The House voted Wednesday to strip many warnings from food labels, potentially affecting alerts about arsenic in bottled water, lead in candy and allergy-causing sulfites, among others.

“This bill is going to overturn 200 state laws that protect our food supply,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif. “Why are we doing that?


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11734532/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. lemme guess, Dems are again voting on legislation
that they haven't read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. briefly blurbed
in a news report on this - it was quickly mentioned that alot of food industry lobbyists are tied to congress on this one

no specific names were mentioned - just a quick "blurb by" - if you weren't paying real close attention you would have missed it

enny-whoo - no big surprise that corporations/lobbyists continue to write/dictate legislation and congress sits there dutifully with steno pad in hand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joyce Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Can we stop this in the Senate or
is it a "done deal" upon passage in the House? This horrifies me. There is not justification for this bill. It was one of the most blatant examples of abuse of power by the corporatocracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Third world countries typically don't bother with warning labels
on their food and since we're working so hard to join them, it follows that we shouldn't have warning labels either. Another assessment is that since the FDA has switched their focus from protecting the consumer (us) to protecting the manufacturer or importer (them), I'm not really sure what effect this has except to make the new unofficial policy...well, official.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. When has THIS Congress done anything to help consumers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What is stupid about this is that the consumers PAY for the labels
so it's not like we are now going to start SAVING money now - it's only going to increase the profits of the corporations. Go organic. Now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. They don't do anything for the people--only for their own back pockets
They do nothing good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder what they are going to start putting into their products
that will make them more money. Time to go organic!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. This should be mentioned in every fall campaign commercial
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 05:53 AM by kurth
This Republican Congress is the most anti-consumer Congress ever. Not to mention anti-American.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Absolutely, this stuff slips under the MSM and these are critical changes
these bums are making....

They public needs to be reminded of specics constantly like this all through the campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. And to add insult to injury...
The government would spend at least $100 million to answer petitions for tougher state rules, according to CBO.


We're less safe, it costs more, and of course we add to the national debt because it's all deficit spending.

Nice job. They got the hat trick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. just wait until a repuke legislator's kid dies
from eating something with peanut oil in it, and their kid has an allergy . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. Rollcall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Everybody needs to hit the phones and start sending E-mails
Accusing our "elected" :eyes: officials of endangering the public health by allowing this to pass. Threaten to vote them out of office for this stunt alone, let alone all the other anti-consumer, anti-American votes they've cast.

This is really getting to be too much...these people work for US, and they are doing everything possible to make our lives worse for their efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I ran a thread devoted to this for nearly a week...
it recieved little DU attention. I'm sick and tired of hearing 'after the fact' anger and outrage lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Too many things going on, hard to stay on top of everything!
Half of the crap that's happening would pass by unknown to me if it weren't for DU and a few other Internet sources. I'm sure the lack of attention wasn't intentional, but it probably got buried under 5 or 6 other big stories at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC