Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING on Senate Floor! Dubai to transfer ports to US company!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:41 PM
Original message
BREAKING on Senate Floor! Dubai to transfer ports to US company!!
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 02:28 PM by The Witch
Warner reading press release...

"In order to preserve good relationship... transferring ports to United States company"


.... hasn't said which company but Halliburton is a good bet!

Warner believes acting in good faith recognizing circumstances....

Schumer is still suspicious, says vote against cloture because of breaking news. amendment should still remain in play, he says.

1:48 pm - Reid up. Saying Democrats forced ethics vote. Being a li'l bit braggy, saying Congress can do 2 things at once.

1:51 - Seems to be going into a canned speech, feels a little irrelevant... c'mon Harry, improvise!

1:53 - Fristenstein says that Americans finish what they start and expect Congress to do the same. (Message: Vote for cloture.)

Using the Greatest Forum to get out my message now----

Frist is now arguing for cloture against Reid. This is BAD. It's going to look like Democrats are stonewalling on ethics reform!!

2:25 p.m. Cloture comes in just about along party lines so we "win." But we're still gonna look bad.
We didn't get Chafee.
We got Jeffords and Salazar, though.
Feinstein changed her aye to no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just what does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
70. That we were duped by the GOP. They'll take credit and look good for '06.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this a scam, with Dubai using a front company?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. that would be my first guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. Mine too.
I'm also wondering what else they own. Also, if Halliburton or some other company gets the business, what's to stop Dubai from buying up their stock?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #27
114. mine three
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. That was my very first thought as well. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mirandapriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
87. that was my first thought
This could all be in appearances and actually interests are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
91. I'm leary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
155. Why won't they tell us the company?
Wouldn't want those Internet bloggers figuring it out. It's got to be someone so toxic that they don't want to make it public till this passes. Some sort of Halliburton sub. or Dubai sub., I'd bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Isn't this the Halliburton compromise? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. oh is it out already?
ehehe I thought it was breaking news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReadTomPaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. No no - your post is new stuff, but days ago there was talk...
about partnering with a US company to make the deal more palatable. The company was, of course, Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wow and Puffy McMoonFace JUST finished his presser!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
44. and he knew all along!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. And we saved Murica, so vote for us
new republcian slogan!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. Schumer: "Devil Is In The Details"
Want US part of Brit company should have no connection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. And Bush can't take credit for it!!!!
Hahahahahaha! Bush loses 100%! His pals don't get their port operations AND he looks like a moron on a national security issue! And now it's too late to do anything about it! Hahahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. but Scott just said: Bush is working with Congress. ..(he will take credit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #40
154. Bush Caved. That's the end game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. SOMEONE on DU posted that THIS IS WHAT THIS DEAL WAS ALL ABOUT!
They predicted that the REAL plan was for HALLIBURTON to get the deal. Should we start taking bets?

I say Halliburton is the new company.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I wouldn't be surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. if it's not Halliburton it's some other company snuggled up
close to BushCo. This smells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. and funded through the back doors of Dubai? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. yup. The more things change, the more they stay the same. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. we have to keep stating the obvious over and over and over again..
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
74. Does anyone know what company? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. I'll give you three guesses
but my first guess is that we only need one guess.............

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
144. Hmmm
Halliburton, Bechtel or the Carlyle Group? I think we probably only need one guess too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
145. ...
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 02:35 PM by Marie26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. Or another Bush friendly company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. Well, either Halliburton or some company associated with the Carlye Group
Papa Bush, James Baker and many others, including the UAE, are in tight with the Carlye Group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
43. we do not know what the 'new entitiy" IS--you may be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
47. I was one of the people suggesting that...there were a couple of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
139. This is nothing new.
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 02:32 PM by Blue_Roses
Halliburton has been working with the UAE for years. It's just becoming more transparent now.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: January 9, 2003

HALLIBURTON AND MARJAN OILFIELD SERVICES TO FORM EMIRATES LOGGING COMPANY L.L.C

Houston, Texas and Abu Dhabi, U.A.E - Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Marjan Oilfield Services, a member of the Al Fahim Group, announced today that they have signed a Joint Venture Agreement and Memorandum and Articles of Association to incorporate a Limited Liability Company to offer open and cased hole logging and wireline perforating services in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.

"The combined logging and perforating strengths of Marjan and Halliburton make for an unbeatable combination," said Joe Rainey, division vice president MEO, Halliburton. "Both companies already have strong positions in the Abu Dhabi market and the JV enhances the positions of both Marjan and Halliburton."

"The Group is committed to this very important sector of the industry, investing for the future in the latest technology, committed to Health, Safety and Environment issues and service quality values; joining forces with Halliburton can only enhance the position of both companies in serving the local community," said Aamer Al Fahim, managing director of Al Fahim Group.

more...

http://www.halliburton.com/news/archive/2003/hesnws_010903.jsp

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. He tried to schooker Schumer, too!
Schumer must not have had any idea what Warner was going to say.

Gotta run out for a bit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Go Schumer
Not backing down a bit. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'm suspecious too
Perhaps Malloy was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. What did Malloy say? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. That it was just an issue for
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 01:51 PM by FreedomAngel82
the republicans to use to "look tough" on security because of their recent poll raitings and it was all a sham. This was back when it first started happening. And I think he or other people or both also said it was a way for the republicans to back away from Bush during an election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. He was right, wasn't he? He was spot on, as usual. I can't wait
until this deal is looked at closer and learn which company(Halliburton) got the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. Oh, JEEZ.
And now Republicans will push through the ethics legislation and it will look like Democrats are stonewalling on ethics! BAD BAD BAD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
81. Thom Hartmann was saying the same thing
I think they're both correct.

This has Rove's fingerprints all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Shall I edit OP or post updates as replies?
lemme know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. Just update here.
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 01:50 PM by in_cog_ni_to
post updates as replies. :) It's easier to follow in one thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Norah on msnbc just said Schumer "pulled a fast one" attaching it to
another bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Schumer is linking ports deal & corruption
saying they are the same issue. I believe him, but repugs won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. really? Did she say the same thing about a similar move
performed by the House Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. no, Norah has a short memory!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. how utterly conveeeenient. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. I guess we should just change our name officially to
The United States of Halliburton. So its win/win for these greedy bastards. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. I predict once Senators find out it IS halliburton they will freak out
AHAHA we just heard something on mikes that wasn't supposed to be there, about pakistan I think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I guessing it's a subsidiary of Halliburton and it will take 'em a
few days to figure out that it's another tentacle of Halliburton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. well then let the bloggers' fingers fly
and we'll call 'em up and let 'em know :)

Power of the netroots! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. Have they announced what "American" company has been given
the "rights?" You just KNOW it's Halliburton. I'll bet Warner knows this already so it's just gravy for all of the corporatists today. :grr: What's important is that at the end of the day Cheney raids our Treasury to make himself more money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. msnbc talking of this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. "Dubai Co. gies up stake in some US ports"--is tag line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. in listening to msnbc-seems Warner is taking the credit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. He read the press release.
he's been fighting for this deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
46. Is Halliburton an American Company?
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 02:13 PM by Cleita
Isn't their corporate headquarters a post office box in Bermuda? I think now would be the perfect time to call Halliburton on this if indeed they are the "US" company. I hope Congress says that it's not good enough. We need an American company incorporated in America!

On edit: I was wrong about Bermuda, but I did dig this up on google:

http://www.topplebush.com/article16_cheney.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
49. "will transfer some of North American ports to US" says Norah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. Frist on floor now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #49
135. "Some" them? Must mean that the 6 or 8 major ones transfers
and the remaining 15 or 16 still get run by Dubai. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rniel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
51. WHAT
I'm outraged I tell you. We can't possibly run our own ports. We need to get some other foreign company in there. Is china or india available? After all it's not like people need jobs in america. We've all got these little plastic credit cards to pay for everything right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. seems Frist is apologizing for the necessity of Senate doing what they
fill they have to do (oppose deal).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
54. please refresh OP - We are in big trouble!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. what do you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
55. Frist seems to be saying Senators are obstructing bills progress!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. 'an attempt to score partison political points" says Frist. oh boy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. That is a NASTY little trick!
How could we have done this to ourselves? CrapTASTIC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. Reid--wants Shumer amendment withdrawn and taken up as separte bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #62
69. This is attached to an ETHICS bill by Schumer? Why did he do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. He was trying to frame the deal as part of the corruption scandal.
It was a good idea, but Rove is more, well, Rovian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. I'm pretty confused.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #72
86. Shumer does not think he will get a separte bill--so attached to ethics
bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #86
88. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #69
83. It's the ongoing lobbying ethics bill; he just wanted to get
the ports bill out there and turned down.
Reid mentioned separating the bills this a.m., and wanted a vote by this afternoon on the ports deal. Now, I dunno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #83
89. OK...thank you.
:) It sounded like Schumer attached it to the lobbying ethics bill. That's why Reid asked for it to be withdrawn from the bill and voted on separately and Frist refused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #55
63. YUP...Reid just said he would vote no on cloture.
Now he wants to withdraw the Schumer bill? Here's the vote eon cloture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #55
84. DiFi voted yes...again. WTF is going on now? This is a cloture vote
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 02:09 PM by in_cog_ni_to
for WHAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
58. Oh, I hope it's Halliburton.
'Cuz when the Dems take over, we should use all that loose wiretapping legislation and do a hurtin' on their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
60. OH....
:spray:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
61. so? we'll contract out our security
to an American company instead of a Dubaian one?

How is this better?

Shouldn't the security of our sea ports have the same priority as our airports, ie. be under the aegis of the Department of Homeland Security?

After all, our SECURITY is supposed to be the job of that shiny, new cabinet department, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. limiting debate now--clocture vote (via Frist)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #65
82. This smells
They're pressuring it. Republicans often invoke cloture to get an immediate vote on a bill before people have a chance to read it. Does anyone know what bill they're voting on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #82
98. Lobbying Ethics bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
64. $10 says Halliburton gets the contract
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. No, I think it's several billion $ that say that :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Brit Hume saying this is really no big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #67
158. Of course, he's got his lips firmly on the GOP's ass...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
68. This whole thing smells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #68
79. this may take some steam out of Congress positions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #68
96. 'Something ain't right with this deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
73. msnbc saying Scott just finished news conference and now waiting for WH
response to new announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #73
75. What--is she saying Scott did not know of this new deal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. Doubt he did.
Warner interrupted Schumer on the floor for this.

Rove, I'm sure, set it up double-blind so it would look like breaking news and Senators couldn't counter-strategize so close to the cloture vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
78. the timing of this whole thing is VERY strange...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. 5 minutes before cloture vote? yeah, it's a little strange.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #80
85. There's a trick here
I just wish we knew what was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #85
90. says Schumer hs an amend to the lobbying bill (port issue)--they are
voting to limit debate on this lobbing bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. this would limit debate on 'non=germaine' amendment (Schumers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. says closture needs 2/3 to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #93
95. Schumers amendment would 'kill the port deal"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. Feinglod says NO, Shumer says NO, Nelson FL sys NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. DeMint says Aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #90
152. here's the CNN story
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A United Arab Emirates-owned company has agreed to turn over all of its operations at U.S. ports to an American "entity," Sen. John Warner said Thursday.

Reading a statement from DP World on the Senate floor, Warner, a Virginia Republican, said the reason is "to preserve" the strong relationship between the UAE and United States.

The announcement comes after congressional leaders reportedly told President Bush that the deal for DP World to assume some operations at six U.S. ports appeared dead on Capitol Hill.

On Wednesday, the House Appropriations Committee essentially blocked the deal by voting 62-2 to insert an amendment into a $68 billion emergency supplemental funding bill for military actions in Iraq and Afghanistan.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/09/port.security/

Still doesn't say what "entity" will take over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
94. We now have to trust HALLIBURTON with Port Security -- or some
similar money-grubbing conglomerate that did not have the capability and
experience to compete fairly for the deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #94
101. "kill the Dubai ports deal"---Schumers amendment--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. Dole AYe, Vitter NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. Kennedy NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
100. UPDATING OP w/Cloture vote periodically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #100
105. Mrs. Lincoln NO, Colman Aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #105
107. harkin and Cantwell, and Durbin NO---Crawfull aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
104. DiFi is useless. Why is she there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
106. Cantwell...NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #106
108. Lautenberg ....NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #108
111. Baucus NO Biden ....NO Carper ...NO Jeffords NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. Byrd ..NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #106
109. Hagel aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #109
112. Biden NO, Carper NO Jeffers NO, Shelby aye Byrd NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
110. WHAT U.S. company?
And what are their ties to the Repubs and Bush? Is there going to be public open bidding process?

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #110
115. Exactly... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #110
116. We don't know the details yet. Probably Halliburton. n/t
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 02:22 PM by in_cog_ni_to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #116
120. Salazar ..NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #120
121. Chaffee YES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #110
117. You'd think wouldn't you? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #110
118. You're so funny!
"Is there going to be public open bidding process?"

bwahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #110
119. Salisar NO, Stevens aye, The public does not know the name yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #119
122. Obama NO, Santorum AYE and Cheffy aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #122
124. Kohl and Mendandaz NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. If clocure is invoked, there will be no more debate on Shumer non-
germaine amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #125
126. Inhoff aye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
123. Menendez NO Kohl...NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
127. McCain yes Pryor NO Rockefeller NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #127
130. Snowe Yes damn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #127
131. snowe AYE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
128. What the hell? Didn't I just read that UAE would fight this?
Tooth and nail. That they would shut down our economy and such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #128
133. I'm sure Bush got on the phone and played let's make a deal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phoebe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
129. if not Halliburton, KBR or Carlyle spinoff, it's American Waterways
Edited on Thu Mar-09-06 02:31 PM by phoebe
- which might be a good thing or maybe there's another Texas pioneer that gave up plenty of money for the chance at this..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
132. So? A scam by any other name...
...would smell as fetid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
134. Grassley yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #134
136. The Witch...could you start a new thread????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #136
137. DiFi NO...hmmm I thought she voted yes earlier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #136
138. I have to go lie down. You wanna do it?
I am home sick from work anyhoo. Shouldn't be typing like crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #138
141. Sure. Hope you feel better soon.
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #138
156. thanks for starting and updating this thread
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
140. Feinstein NO, (changed her vote I see te he)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
142. AP story is up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #142
149. Dubai Firm to Give Up Stake in U.S. Ports
Dubai Firm to Give Up Stake in U.S. Ports

By DAVID ESPO 12 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - A Dubai-owned company said Thursday it is giving up its management stake in some U.S. ports, a move made as congressional leaders warned
President Bush that both the House and Senate appeared ready to block the takeover.


It was not immediately clear whether the announcement would be enough to cool widespread sentiment in Congress to pass legislation blocking the deal, which has become a burdensome election-year problem for Republicans.

Sen. John Warner (news, bio, voting record), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, took the Senate floor to read to colleagues a company press release disclosing its new stance.

"Because of the strong relationship between the United Arab Emirates and the United States and to preserve that relationship, DP World has decided to transfer fully the U.S. operation of P&O Operations North America to a United States entity," DP World's chief operating officer, Edward H. Bilkey, said in the statement that Warner relayed to other senators. The announcement did not specify which American company would be involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #149
150. FRist NO NO NO NO NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #150
151. one grahm says aye and the other says NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #151
153. 51-47 ---so, the motion is NOT agreed to (needed 2/3 reasons)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
143. Hasn't this "vote" been going on an excessively long time?
I see DiFi leaving the pit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
146. so, The WH is trying to make port deal more palpitable--but Schumer
still says Kill it dead)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
147. THREAD # 2 is up. Link...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
148. Halliburton has a subsidiary call Seaforth Maritime Ltd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #148
157. KBR Sold that off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC