Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EXCLUSIVE-THE DUBAI DEAL YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT (TIME)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:26 PM
Original message
EXCLUSIVE-THE DUBAI DEAL YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT (TIME)
Web Exclusive| Business & Technology
The Dubai Deal You Don't Know About

Even as one company gives up on U.S. ports, a different Middle Eastern firm remains a major contractor for the Navy

By DAREN FONDA



Posted Thursday, Mar. 09, 2006
With midterm elections approaching, no politician wanted to go home and explain to voters why a company controlled by the government of Dubai was taking over operations at six U.S. ports—without so much as a meow of protest from Congress. As it turns out, that won't be necessary. Dubai Ports World, the firm at the center of the controversy, announced today that it would give up its bid to manage U.S. ports, agreeing to transfer the contracts to a “U.S. entity."

Yet while one Dubai company may be giving up on U.S. ports, another one shows no signs of quitting the U.S.—or of giving up a contract with the Navy to provide shore services for vessels in the Middle East. The firm, Inchcape Shipping Services (ISS), is an old British company that last January was sold to a Dubai government investment vehicle for $285 million. ISS has more than 200 offices around the world and provides services to clients ranging from cruise ship operators to oil tankers to commercial cargo vessels. In the U.S., the company operates out of more than a dozen port cities, including Houston, Miami and New Orleans, arranging pilots, tugs, linesmen and stevedores, among other things. The firm is also a defense contractor which has long worked for Britain’s Royal Navy. And last June, the U.S. Navy signed on too, awarding ISS a $50 million contract to be the “Husbanding Agent” for vessels in most Southwest Asia ports, including those in the Middle East, according to an unclassified Navy logistics manual, for the Fifth Fleet, and a press release from ISS.

Why is a Dubai shipping services company doing business with the Pentagon when handing over U.S. port operations to the emirate would supposedly compromise national security? Because it makes sense. Call it the reality of living in a globally connected business world. Your IBM laptop is now manufactured by a Chinese company that may outsource customer support to an Indian firm and the logistics to FedEx. Dubai companies aren't just buying overseas assets like hotels in New York and wax museums in London; they're providing jobs and business for U.S. companies. Boeing, for one, can only hope it doesn't receive a frosty reception the next time it wants to sell airplanes to Dubai's booming airline, Emirates. Rival Airbus would be more than happy to take advantage of Washington's creeping protectionism.

http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1171773,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. No foreign governments operating our ports, our military, our anything.
That's what we have American companies for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there any source to find out just how many US infracture sources
have already been outsourced? I know all about the businesses who have outsourced their customer service, tech cupport and such. I don't mean that! I mean the things like you're talking abou there. Shipping services, port services, aircraft repair and maintenance, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Shhh!

That's classified, for our protection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlsmith1963 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. This Needs to Be Looked Into
I don't want terrorist-supporting countries involved in *any* of our business! Why does Bush keep doing things like this? It makes me wonder whose side he is *really* on.

Tammy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here is the answer to WHY this is happening....
From the article:

The Navy, for one, has long understood that it would be virtually impossible to rely solely on Western-owned companies for critical services. It simply couldn’t operate without local firms providing logistics support at the 200 ports its ships visit around the world.

In other words, the reason this is necessary is because the USA is a...

GLOBAL EMPIRE!!!!



*a-hem*

As I was saying, it is now necessary to compromise our national security because it's too expensive to do so otherwise. That makes sense, right?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-09-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Look into the Ptech/GoAgile scandal revolving around 9-11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wrinkle_In_Time Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-10-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Google Inchscape and Halliburton...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC