Claude "Fingers" Allen didn't start his life on the wrong side of the law:
WaPo March 2005
....And although his parents were staunch Democrats, he chose to become a Republican, saying he identified more closely with the party's platform.....
In his new post, Allen said he is eager to help shape the president's vision of an "ownership society" that gives people more choices -- but fewer guarantees -- on everything from Social Security checks to health care coverage.
It looks like the position he held was the equivalent of Bruce Reed's in the
Clinton administration. Reed was a lot more "out there", wasn't he? Maybe that's just the difference between one president who actually
had a domestic policy, and one who doesn't.
Here's something odd. Did the WH cover up the reason for Allen's resignation? On Feb 9th, the Trib
reported:
Allen’s office referred a request for an interview with him this evening to the White House press office, which wasn't immediately available to comment on a report first made today by The Swamp.
But White House spokesman Scott McClellan said tonight that Allen is seeking more time with his family and cited purely personal reasons for stepping down after a few tough years in high-level posts.
And a week later, he was hosting
"Ask the White House". Why would they have put him out there like that if they knew he was under investigation? Faux pas by a characteristically incompetent WH or a cover up?
Like Ms Noonan always says, it would be irresponsible not to speculate.
But wait, they
did know about the investigation-
The night of Jan. 2, after an alleged incident at the Target in Gaithersburg, Md., presidential spokesman Scott McClellan said Allen called White House chief of staff Andy Card to tell him what had happened. The next morning, Allen spoke in person with Card and White House counsel Harriet Miers.
McClellan said Allen told Card and Miers that it was all a misunderstanding and cited confusion with his credit card because he had moved several times. "He assured them that he had done nothing wrong and the matter would be cleared up," McClellan said.
The president first learned of Allen's planned departure and the January incident in early February. But since Allen had passed the usual background checks and had no other prior issues that White House officials were aware of, "he was given the benefit of the doubt," McClellan said.
Now, can we responsibly speculate about how much security clearance comes with "the benefit of the doubt"?