Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT Sunday Splash: A Secret History of the Iraq War-Reliant On US Mil Docs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-11-06 04:26 PM
Original message
NYT Sunday Splash: A Secret History of the Iraq War-Reliant On US Mil Docs
New York Times Sunday splash: A secret history of the Iraq war, reliant on U.S. military documents
RAW STORY
Published: March 11, 2006



The New York Times plans the first in a series of two articles regarding Saddam Hussein's pre-war and Iraq war strategy based on a "secret U.S. military history." While the story looks to shed light on the internal workings of the Hussein government, it relies largely on internal U.S. military documentation, secret interviews, and the interrogation records of American analysts, many of whom posed as "military historians."

Another story describes Saddam's "frantic" escape in early April 2003 as US troops approached Baghdad, based on a "day-by-day reconstruction of Saddam's movements" compilted by the U.S. Joint Forces Command.

Both articles were written by Michael Gordon, chief military correspondent of the Times, and Bernard Trainor, authors of the soon to be published book, Cobra 11: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq. An earlier article written by the pair claimed that German spies passed on secret intelligence to the United States before the invasion, though the Berlin government has denied that it happened.

The documents purport that Saddam was "deeply distrustful" of his own soldiers, making crucial decisions himself and micromanaging, effectively hobbling his forces. Some examples, the TIMES says, include:

read more at:
http://rawstory.com/news/2006/New_York_Times_Sunday_splash_A_0311.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just read this article in the Times. It was excellent and very
very interesting, a must read. Saddam didn't have any wmd - and he didn't think the US would really invade. He was caught between trying to let the US know he had nothing while having his enemies (Iran and Shiites) believe he did. He was more worried about a Shiite uprising than with the US invading. Facinating stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We have insured ...
.. that the Shia and Iran will win in Iraq.... eventually.

Is there a word for this kind of thing beyond "clusterfuck"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That is the exact word I used when I got into a fight with my
brothers-in-law at the Easter Egg hunt, before the invasion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is what I've said all along--Saddam was afraid to admit he had no WMD
He was using them as a bluff to keep the Shiites and Kurds in line. Even his own commanders didn't know the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC