|
ok, stalin was a political gangster, he killed vsst numbers of people, deported entire populations etc...he had trotsky murdered, he might have been involved in killing lenin; he certainly had lenin's widow killed. yet you implicate the revolution, the blessed USSR, in the crimes of one bastard? to defend the revolution, yes, i'll try explain stalin away- but remember that WE, the freest people in history, couldn't preserve our society when plotted against by cheap crooks like bushinc, and WE look quite helpless against milk fed ninnies like rumsvelt and cheney! at least stalin was a tormented psychotic, who lived in terror until the day he died and he might have did it all for the revolution, just like the gopigs are doing it all for 'jesus'. Had the west not pressured the USSR in the years of civil war and famine etc; had the anti-communist nuts not demonised the communist movement, who's to say how stalin would have reacted? History is fulla bushevik bs, for example: "...Rather Vidal has drawn on a rich and scholarly literature published in the last decade to remind his readers that much of what orthodox court historians have written about the Cold War was simply wrong. With regards to Hiroshima, perhaps Vidal had in mind Truman's July 18th, 1945 handwritten diary reference to a "telegram from jap emperor asking for peace" " - from pg 78 of Gore Vidal's 'Dreaming War, blood for oil' etc... the US A-bombed Hiroshima on august 8th, i believe it was... the point again is that stalin should never have happened, as hitler shouldn't have happened, had the WEST, iow WE, acted like responsible adults and controlled that element which today rules washington dc! Don't blame the victims!
|