Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret Nuclear Warhead - UK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
RedOnce Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 09:37 AM
Original message
Secret Nuclear Warhead - UK

Revealed: UK develops secret nuclear warhead


The Sunday Times - March 12, 2006

BRITAIN has been secretly designing a new nuclear warhead in conjunction with the Americans, provoking a legal row over the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

The government has been pushing ahead with the programme while claiming that no decision has been made on a successor to Britain’s Trident nuclear deterrent. Work on a new weapon by scientists at the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston in Berkshire has been under way since Tony Blair was re-elected last May, and is now said to be ahead of similar US research.

The aim is to produce a simpler device using proven components to avoid breaching the ban on nuclear testing. Known as the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW), it is being designed so that it can be tested in a laboratory rather than by detonation. “We’ve got to build something that we can never test and be absolutely confident that, when we use it, it will work,” one senior British source said last week.

Developing a new weapon would also, according to expert advice from Cherie Booth’s Matrix chambers, be a material breach of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. The office of Lord Goldsmith, the attorney-general, refused to comment on whether it had been asked for legal advice by No 10.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0%2C%2C2087-2081800%2C00.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Blair Administration follows Bush time and again, no
matter how slimy for the planet Bush's plans are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. They work for the same company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
5X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Notice he says 'when we use it', nof if....
'when we use it, it will work,” one senior British source said last week.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ufomammut Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. "We CANNOT afford a mineshaft gap!"
Kubrick's darkly comical masterpiece seems more grimly prophetic all the time ...only I'm not laughing, these psychotic fuckwits are serious. ...and that's really the biggest, most stark division in this country ..it's not between repugs and dems or DINO's, it's between how many can connect the dots, read the writing on the wall, in other words, discern what is flagrantly obvious, versus those, left or right, who either will not or can not, realistically gauge what's happening in this potentially terminal phase of our existence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muddy Waters Guitar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush's legacy encapsulated: "I made the world a nuclear playground"
What an idiot. People plunging into poverty, AIDS raging around the world, forests disappearing, and Bush and his fellow idiots in the US and UK can't do anything but wank about the possibility of a new nuke that would break the NPT? Maybe they won't know until the nuke explodes in whatever lab they're testing it in-- guess that'd be nice confirmation, huh?

I wonder what the idiot British in this case could have accomplished with the money they spent on this foolish project, had it been devoted to peaceful purposes. Better AIDS therapies? More nutritious strains of rice and wheat for the poor? Cleaner fuels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ufomammut Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Evangelical Apocalypse
Since it's not in the mainstream, many people simly don't understand the apocalyptic "faith based" approach inherent in every policy of the ruling power structure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedOnce Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sad...but true!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. The British have been using US designed weapons for decades now
When the government has the chance to ditch them it bows down and dutifully buys second-hand technology from the US. My view is if you can't afford to build and develop them yourself - don't.

The price tag for this luxury, £25 billion, is a lot of money and I am certain that the money would be better spent on conventional weaponry or civil programmes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC