|
Edited on Mon Mar-13-06 02:59 AM by Hippo_Tron
There are differences. Paul Wellstone, as I'm sure you know, was the loudest hardest working champion for working people in the US Senate. No cause was beneath Paul Wellstone. He stood up for everybody who had nobody to stand up for them.
Feingold was elected to the US Senate two years after Wellstone and followed Wellstone's grassroots small contributions model to get himself elected. Like Wellstone, he was a nobody who unseated an incumbent Republican senator. Part of Feingold's election was his pledge with Wisconsin that he wrote on his garage door. It said, amongst other things, that he would not accept automatic pay raises during his term (if they re-elected him, he would accept the pay raise), he would spend most of his time in Wisconsin, send his kids to school in Wisconsin, take most of his campaign money from Wisconsin, hold listening sessions every year in all of Wisconsin's counties.
Feingold differs from Wellstone in that he limits his visibility in championing specific pet issues. Wellstone was a force for good in any arena that he saw. Feingold definately fights the good fight that Wellstone did on all of these issues, but he plays a lesser role on many of them. In Wellstone's book "The Conscience of a Liberal", Feingold is mentioned as one of the 6 or 7 senators joining Wellstone in a key fight (can't remember exactly what it was).
Feingold's two most visible issues are by far Campaign Finance Reform and Civil Liberties. Wellstone also supported these causes, but Feingold dedicates a lot more of his work to these issues in particular. Feingold is also a lawyer and Wellstone was not, which definately shows when you listen to the two speak (not that this is a good or a bad thing, but it's just different).
Overall, the differences are largely in style. They are both two of the best people to ever serve in the US Senate and both have been championing the same values for over a decade. The difference is that they are two different people who accomplish/accomplished their goals in different ways. Wellstone's visibility made him a hero of the left, which Feingold has not become (not yet anyway). All the same, Feingold's style might make him a better national candidate and I'm sure that if Wellstone were alive today, he would campaign tirelessly to see Russ Feingold become President of the United States.
|