Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush could have, would have and did go to war on his own.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:10 PM
Original message
Bush could have, would have and did go to war on his own.
How can anyone try to argue that Bush violated one resolution to claim spying is legal, but not the other resolution to claim he acted legally in starting the war?

He wasn't authorized to fu_cking invade a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 and posed no threat to America.

He took it upon himself and he should be impeached for acting like a fu_king tyrant.

Now, anyone who wants to blame the Democrats for this little fu_k's arrogance, feel free to, and I know you will. But Bush is a fu_king criminal and should be held accountable.

Give the fu_k any law you want, make it fu_king perfect, and I guarantee his ass will break it and find a way to justify it with spin. So sit and spin fu_king incorrect and pointless assessments about the Democrats being complicit, but they are not responsible for this:


Destroying America's health care system
Trying to steal Social Security
Leaving every child behind
Outsourcing jobs
Outsourcing national security
Putting the nation at risk
Pushing the Alternative Minimum Tax on Americans
Turning oil industry royalties into subsidies
Spending $500,000,000,000 on the Iraq war
Falsifying WMD information
Continuing an illegal war in Iraq
Failing to deal effectively with the Middle East peace process
Pushing a failed foreign policy that resulted in a win for Hamas
Leaking the name of a CIA agent -- Plame outing
Supporting Republican gerrymandering (Republican version of election reform---create districts in which it’s no longer necessary to suppress the African American vote at the polls)
Stonewalling real election reform
Sanctioning torture
Illegally spying on American
$9 trillion debt ceiling
Trying to avert blame for the Bush administration's incompetent response to Katrina
Appointing cronies at every level and in every branch of government
Lying about dealings with Abramoff and other criminals
Allowing Halliburton to rip off tax payers
Obstructing Congressional oversight
Enabling a dictatorial-style government in America
Endorsing payola
Other law-breaking and unethical activities



Bush is.



He and his administration fu_ked the country and is continuing to fu_k the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow - and, of course, you are absolutely right.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The ongoing spin is amazing! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WildEyedLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am starting to think that those who prefer to blame Democrats...
... for BUSH'S evils are not on our side, in every sense of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Apologists in disguise or
is it the FU if you're not my candidate and FU Democrats crowd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Nice rant n/t
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelBird Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
6. Of course
The war resolution was just a ploy to "legitimize" the invasion, I don't have any doubt that if the Iraq War Resolution hadn't passed in Congress that Bush would have gone on with it anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
7. Another Wow response. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fu_king-A right
You got that straight on the money.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. My fu_kng pleasure! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. I hate to break up this
little hallelujah chorus with reality, but mikec explained exactly why Congressional dems who voted for the IWR are accountable for their votes, and he did so with voluminous documentation.
It's all in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=364&topic_id=641333&mesg_id=641333
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Wrong!
Edited on Tue Mar-14-06 07:09 AM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Just because he put up the text of IWR doesn't document his point since he
avoids acknowledging that Bush was in violation of the IWR specifically where it refers to the UN res. that put weapons inspectors back in - Bush's OFFICIAL Letter to Congress was a LIE. He said he found and determined war was necessary after taking the steps outlined in the IWR, when we all KNOW that weapons inspectors were reporting the exact opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. If Bu$h were to invade the country responsible for 911...

...he'd have to invade America (which I think he has done).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-14-06 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. You sure got that right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peter Frank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Good catch...

;)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC