Anyone see that lying creep Bill Sammon on Washington Journal?

[CatWoman]

he was spreading so many lies, most specifically how Bush "handily won Election 2000."

He said that a consortium of newspapers analyzed the data and concluded that Chimpy would have won, no matter which vote counting method would have been used.

Lying scum bag!!! That is NOT what the consortium concluded!!!!

I tried my best to phone in, but couldn't get in.

I would have called him a lying scum bag right then and there.

Funny how he used the Florida panhandle as an example of how the "liberal press" were so quick to award the state to Gore even though they were still voting.

Election 2004 gave Georgia to Bush while people here were still voting.

That dog don't hunt.

[Daphne08]

1. I had to turn if off. Just could not abide the propaganda. n/t

[asjr]

2. Same here. I couldn't even stand to look at him.

[CatWoman]

3. He recently jumped ship from the Moonie Times

I think because they are losing money.

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/the_revolving_door/default.asp

[Coexist]

4. ... but didn't you hear him say that the Times has no connection

to Moon?!

[asjr]

5. I think he was referring to the Examiner. He works (tells lies) for

them now.

[Catherine Vincent]

6. Ever since I saw this Bush toady on cspan during the 2000 election,

I try to avoid him. He sat up there and was so offended that Gore looked him in the eye and told some lie (I don't even remember what it was about) right there in his face and ever since then he didn't respect Gore. And yet he shills for that thief by the name of Bush, in the White House 24/7. I saw some of it this a.m. but will watch the rest later. I can imagine all the lies he was telling. And I didn't care for the guy opposite him because he said he was a libertarian and imo, libertarians are repaublicans in disguse. You notice that guy managed to mention that he thought the Clinton adminstration was corrupt but didn't say that about the Bush administration. If he did, I may have missed it.

[peacetalksforall]

7. I can't listen to him. My guess is that he railed against Clinton on

about 3 shows a day, 7 days a week for a decade during the 1990's. He tries to come across as an intellectual, but he is a a hard line propagandist. Know and note.

I can't take Peter either. I always seem to walk away when Peter hosts. I can't bear to see him in pain when someone says something against George or PNAC. Poor pathetic Peter in pain, pains me.