can refuse to fulfill duties which are considered their professional obligation?
Yet another state (Washington) is considering allowing pharmacists to refuse to dispense meds (namely morning after pill, or Plan B; see link below): "Pharmacists who object to Plan B want to be able to deny filling a prescription on moral, ethical or religious beliefs."
What other professionals have the right to refuse to do part of their professional duties because they object to that duty on moral, ethical, or religious beliefs? Pharmacists have a choice: either fulfill all their professional duties, or find another job.Al
Would we allow doctors and nurses to refuse to treat patients because they disagree with that patient's lifestyle choices? (I personally don't feel OB/GYNs should have the right to refuse to do abortions - and clearly, for example, in the case of ectopic pregnancies, abortions are done).
Does a doctor have the right to refuse to prescribe Plan B (requested by a patient) because they have a moral objection to it?
Does a doctor have the right to refuse to prescribe birth control to an unmarried patient?
Does a doctor have the right to refuse to prescribe AIDS-related treatment to a man who contracted the disease through homosexual relations (which the dr. feels are immoral)?
Finally, can a doctor justify refusal to treat a patient because that patient is a known homophobe or bigot? (those things are morally reprehensible to me - whereas I have no moral objections to a woman choosing abortion)
Does a medical technician have the right to refuse to run amniocentesis testing because they know that a woman who requests the test is fairly likely to terminate the pregnancy if the test shows some serious problem with the fetus?
Can a public school teacher refuse to teach a child because the child's parents are homosexual (or heterosexual, if the teacher is morally opposed to heterosexuality)?
Allowing professionals to pick and choose which of their professional duties will be fulfilled is a very dangerous practice - if a person cannot meet their professional duties, they should not enter the profession. (I don't feel such refusal is justifiable even when there is an alternative person who can fulfill the duty).
===================
http://www.komotv.com/stories/42362.htm""They are really elevating their interests, their personal interests above the needs of the patient," says Nancy Sapiro with the Northwest Women's Law Center. "The regulations that govern pharmacists are very clear that patients' interests come first." "