Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"A recent surge in violence..." - Update #2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
EarlG ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 12:23 AM
Original message
"A recent surge in violence..." - Update #2
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 12:28 AM by EarlG
A week or so ago I noticed that the phrase "recent surge in violence" has cropped up an awful lot in news reports coming out of Iraq over the past few years, which got me wondering how often these "recent surges" occur. Anyway, I thought it might not be a bad idea to keep tabs on the phrase, so here's the latest update...

March 6, 2006: The training at the desert village is especially important for the Marines of the First Battalion, 14th Marine Regiment, 4th Marine Division. The battalion, made up mostly of Marine reservists, is leaving soon for Iraq, where sectarian tensions have brought a recent surge in violence -- and growing concerns about civil war.

March 10, 2006: Iraqi forces, not American troops, would deal with a civil war if one erupts in Iraq and U.S. troop cuts remained possible despite a recent surge in violence, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said on Thursday.

March 11, 2006: Moving to the recent surge in violence that has swept Iraq, Ritter said he wasn’t surprised as the only thing holding the three infighting ethnic and religious groups (Kurds, Shia, and Sunnis) together since the end of the Ottoman Empire after World War I was Saddam Hussein's Ba’athist Party.

March 13, 2006: Despite the recent surge in violence in Iraq, Mr. Reid said he believed that civil war was "neither imminent nor inevitable." He said Iraqi security forces now numbered around 235,000, with 5,000 more volunteering to join every month.


The original "recent surge in violence" post:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/EarlG/13

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. "sectarian violence" is cropping up with increasing frequency
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 01:06 AM by gristy
707 hits for "surge in sectarian violence" http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&q=%22surge+in+sectarian+violence%22&btnG=Search+News
Just 4 hits for "recent surge in sectarian violence" http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&ned=us&ie=UTF-8&q=%22recent+surge+in+sectarian+violence%22&btnG=Search+News


sec·tar·i·an Pronunciation Key (sk-târ-n) adj.
1. Of, relating to, or characteristic of a sect.
2. Adhering or confined to the dogmatic limits of a sect or denomination; partisan.
3. Narrow-minded; parochial.




In the 24 years prior to 1 year ago (1981-March 2005), the term "sectarian violence" appeared in the NY Times all of 41 times. In the past year, it has appeared 79 times, with half of those in the past month.

So, what is this all about? Either violence around the world in years/decades past was not sectarian in nature, OR we have a new word being applied to an old problem. Why is this happening? Is it important? I don't know...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. That phrase dehumanizes violence.
It's always described in "waves". "Surges" are things that occur during storms. It takes the human element out of the violence which allows the public to see the perpetrators of the violence in "less than human" terms. It also elevates the violence to a "force of nature" something that is unstoppable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's their intention though, isn't it
Take out the human element and you remove any risk of offense on your block of voters.

They learned from their mistakes in the past and they are much better at manipulating the masses today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. it's a Tsunami of violence
and it's killing in waves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC