Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMFG!!! Are you watching Cafferty right now?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 07:59 PM
Original message
OMFG!!! Are you watching Cafferty right now?
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 08:01 PM by Just Me
About Democrats "cowering"?

:wow:

On edit: he was just reading emails about Democrats running and hiding everytime the "war on terror" is mentioned!!! A part of me is saying, "awesome" while another part is thinking, "ohhhh shit".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ummmm....no.
Details?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sorry. I edited to include some details. People are pissed that,...
,...Democrats are "running and hiding" from the "war on terror" rhetoric rather than backing Feingold's censure for illegal behavior.

I was,...shocked,...yet, rather pleased that Jack kinda' *giggle* put the fire directly under the asses of our reps.

I just, don't know what to think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm hoping some of our hapless Dems were watching. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I saw that.
I took it the same way you did and was rather pleased myself. I didn't think Cafferty was ragging on Dems, just trying to light a fire. Sometimes the truth hurts. When they grow 'some' they will have earned the praise. I use to hate Cafferty then suddenly it seemed like someone took away his koolaide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's just wrong - mediaspin is out of control on this story.
All the Bush mediawhores are spinning against Dems, when Feingold is getting censure into committee and censure is GATHERING support. Kerry, Harkin, and Boxer support and Harkin signed as co-sponsor. More will follow as judiciary committee Dems like Kennedy discuss it in committee with Feingold.

The breathless reporting attacking Dems is pure media spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He was reading letters from people like us; DUers could have
written them. It's apparent there's a lot of anger out there at Dems in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Is the teevee reporting that Russ is gathering support?
:shrug:

Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Nope, because most everyone
with the exception of Harkin, Kerry, and Boxer, are remaining mum so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Media not reporting it correctly, at all. Feingold was on Ed Schultz today
and said it's moving. and he's happy it's in committee, and that now they have more time to work it through.

It was GOPs trying to rush a vote to control the story.

The mediawhores are spinning against the Dems so even the Dems buy into it. Feingold probably shouldn't have said Dems were cowering to FOX.

I don't think Kerry said one word against any judiciary committee Dem who held off leading a filibuster which forced him to take it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. As usual.
So Cafferty is back to his usual repuke butt kissing? Knew he was too good to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Actually, that is not right.
Cafferty was questioning the lack of support from Russ Feingold fellow Democrats, regarding the censure measure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Because that's what mediaspin is from whores like Milbank
Edited on Wed Mar-15-06 08:29 PM by blm
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Oh sorry I stand corrected and good to know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. No - the mediaspin is driving the story - Cafferty is caught up in spin
no differently than many here on DU.

Cafferty is not a newsman, but a commentator who observes the news. It's the WaPo whore Milbank's article that is causing alot of the fury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Well good to know!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Welllll, I dunno' about that. Jack seemed rather supportive of Feingold.
That's the thing!!! Jack was challenging those who failed to suppport Feingold's pressure to hold this pResident responsible/accountable.

I can't figure if,...his challenge was,...bad.

Instinctively, I FEEL it was GREAT. Politically? :shrug: I like my instincts better on this one because I NEED a vibrant, passionate goshdamned opposition party to these abusive, exploitative assholes.

So, I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. It's the slam on Dems based on Milbank's bad reporting that I refer to.
I just think Cafferty got caught up in the spin just like many on DU have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not only that.....
But instead of the media discussing the merits of the censure (which should be impeachment far as I'm concerned = beaucoup merits) they are dissing the Dems some more! Distract, distract, distract from the real issue as always. I realize that the Dems running with their skirts up as though they just saw a mouse doesn't help a lot.....but the media always got to pile on and forget about the real issue.....


Gawd How I hate the fucked up whore media! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. But, Jack was "pulling" Democrats into supporting Feingold.
That's the thing.

It was almost as though he was sending a message, "DON'T BE SO GADDAMNED FEARFUL, YOUSE GOT SUPPORT!!!!"

I dunno' what to make of it except he invited people to send a clear message,...AND THEY DID!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I absolutely agree with your explanation.
Buck up and Join, already!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Exactly! Cafferty is just as fed up as we are
& he's holding a mirror up for them to see themselves.

With 34% approval ratings for the "president", they should be hopping to action!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. BASED on Milbank's descriptions of Dems?
Sorry, but at least half of Milbank's article attacking Dems was lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. democrats have a lot to say, they just cant get past the fascist censors..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Democrats need to be united in offering an alterntative position...
on anti-terror policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-15-06 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. They NEED to take noble and, yes, "righteous" risks, without fear.
They HAVE to BEEEEE LEADERS if they want to maintain their political positions and to sincerely serve our interests.

FUCK!!!! They don't even have to be liars or sociopaths or power-mongers to exert their interest in our Republic. What's their problem? They are facing an amoral, abusive and barbaric opposition.

FUCK!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC