Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WAPO: BUSH TO REAFFIRM PREEMPTIVE WAR STRATEGY TODAY!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:00 AM
Original message
WAPO: BUSH TO REAFFIRM PREEMPTIVE WAR STRATEGY TODAY!
Bush to Restate Terror Strategy
2002 Doctrine of Preemptive War To Be Reaffirmed

By Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 16, 2006; Page A01

President Bush plans to issue a new national security strategy today reaffirming his doctrine of preemptive war against terrorists and hostile states with chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, despite the troubled experience in Iraq.

The long-overdue document, an articulation of U.S. strategic priorities that is required by law, lays out a robust view of America's power and an assertive view of its responsibility to bring change around the world. On topics including genocide, human trafficking and AIDS, the strategy describes itself as "idealistic about goals and realistic about means."

The strategy expands on the original security framework developed by the Bush administration in September 2002, before the invasion of Iraq. That strategy shifted U.S. foreign policy away from decades of deterrence and containment toward a more aggressive stance of attacking enemies before they attack the United States.

The preemption doctrine generated fierce debate at the time, and many critics believe the failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq fatally undermined an essential assumption of the strategy -- that intelligence about an enemy's capabilities and intentions can be sufficient to justify preventive war.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/15/AR2006031502297.html

THE NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY
National Security Strategy Overview (From The White House)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/
National Security Strategy of the United States 2006 (pdf File)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/nss2006.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where's that missle defense system when we REALLY need it?
:tinfoilhat:
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. kpete: You should put more of your threads in your journal.
You always find so much great stuff to bring back to DU. It would be great to be able to read all of it in one place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. this is all over the news
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20060315-2202-bush-nationalsecurity.html

and to think I was worried about climate change, our demise will be nuclear proliferation:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. This Is Just Another Sign That They Are Getting Poised And Ready....
for a strike on Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. In other news
The American People have decided the President is simply batshit insane.

:)

Thanks for the update, kpete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chefgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Same drumbeat, different target
Sounds exactly like the run up to the first enormously successful preemptive war. :sarcasm:

Same shit, different country.

-chef-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I actually had this conversation last night with several friends. I
said there is no evidence Iran has nuclear weapons. Several people pointed out that yes they do, it's all over the news and the government said so. And you can guess what I said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Cripes! Now the reporters using Bush Admin. fave term, "robust."
I'm so SICK of that word - Condi and Cheney throw it out a lot also. It's a code word for "MANLY", i.e., strong, sturdy, vigorous, bold, firm and unyielding. Our economy is robust, right? Not.

The question here is whether this "reporter" just forgot to put quotes around the word, or whether he's been brainwashed into using this flattering adjective on his own. I don't think Bush has laid out a "robust view" of America's war strategies. The adjectives I would use are illegal (under the principles of international law), blood thirsty, apocalyptic, offensive, horrifying, etc.

If the Washington Post thinks Bush's plan is a "robust view", that opinion should be on the editorial page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Three words: Iran + Oil Bourse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Only true madmen
are this delusional. Is it time to throw the bucket of water on him yet?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
11. it worked so well the first time!
this was discussed this morning on c-span. It really brings out the bloodthirsty chicken hawk freeper callers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC