Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Scalia: Public Should Decide on Abortion---WHAT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:14 AM
Original message
Justice Scalia: Public Should Decide on Abortion---WHAT?
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia railed against the era of the "judge-moralist," saying judges are no better qualified than "Joe Sixpack" to decide moral questions such as abortion and gay marriage.

"Anyone who thinks the country's most prominent lawyers reflect the views of the people needs a reality check," he said during a speech to New England School of Law students and faculty at a Law Day banquet on Wednesday night.

The 70-year-old justice said the public, through elected legislatures - not the courts - should decide watershed questions such as the legality of abortion.

Scalia decried his own court's recent overturning of a state anti-sodomy law, joking that he personally believes "sexual orgies eliminate tension and ought to be encouraged," but said a panel of judges is not inherently qualified to determine the morality of such behavior.

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/16/02331.shtml?s=ic

I am speechless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. That'd be that criminal's worst nightmare.
Fat Tony talks big. :rofl:

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy M Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds to me like Scalia has some kinks in his closet!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. well we know he's into self-flagellation
as prescribed by Opus Dei
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. And meanwhile
Freeper heads explode. Film at 11.

heh heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well then Fat Tony, let's do this thing
Put up a nationwide referendum on the ballot, and whichever side gets the most votes wins. Judging by the polls, I think that pro-choice would be the one left standing, by a very large number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Justice Scalia believes popular opinion should trump the Bill of Rights?
If we were to follow what Scalia is advocating here, a black man and white woman would have never been allowed to marry. Further, the black man would have probably been shot or tortured for his "lustfulness" of pure white women.

This is absolutely the most asinine thing I've ever heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Yep....otherwise known as “MOB RULE”
Scalia's such a mental midget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. The majority doesn't get to decide whether or not we have a right to
privacy. That's why we have a Constitution, to protect our rights from the will of the majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe the'y like to bring it to a public vote..like the elections..
"Hello, Diebold?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. They are not supposed to judge morality but constitutionality.
Our laws should not be based on a popular conseption of morality but on our constitution. Most people who upheld slavery and segregation did so based on their moral beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. The US Constitution was written to protect from tyranny of the majority
If the people were allowed to make such decisions women would not be allowed to vote or Blacks allowed Freedom. If People were allowed to vote there would be no need for Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
W_HAMILTON Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Yep
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 10:10 AM by W_HAMILTON
As a gay person, I get tired of this argument that it should be left up to the people to decide on these moral issues. As you pointed out, equal rights shouldn't be left up to popular vote.

If we're gonna do that, we should just vote on everything. We can then have zones that are anti-gay, and anti-black, and anti-abortion, and anti-cigarette, and anti-Hispanic, and anti-white, and anti-Republican (woohoo!), and anti-Muslim, and anti-Christianity (sure the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, but if jackasses like Scalia want to shit on the whole "all men are created equal" part, why care about anything the Constitution says at all?), etc. That would make for a great country of our's, huh? :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. The man is off his rocker.. The last couple of speeches he has given
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 09:41 AM by converted_democrat
have been downright strange.. Couple weeks ago he was giving one that was on C-Span, and he was saying strange stuff at that one too.. I watched it, and there was a thread about it here on DU.. He was a total asshole..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'll go him one better....Individuals should decide moral questions for
themselves...not the state representatives nor Congress nor the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. good way to frame it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
15. I thought the court's job was to determine constitutionality, not morality
I want to see his job description!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Good God! "sexual orgies eliminate tension and ought to be encouraged,"
WTF?? What a crude remark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC