Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Connecticut man sues for return of colonial document

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:51 AM
Original message
Connecticut man sues for return of colonial document
HARTFORD, Conn. -- A Connecticut man has filed a lawsuit against federal authorities and the governor of North Carolina in an ongoing fight over the ownership of an original copy of the Bill of Rights.


Robert Matthews, a businessman with ties to former Gov. John G. Rowland, is challenging the seizure of the document three years ago. Matthews had bought a half interest in the document in 2000.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in U.S. District Court, names U.S. attorneys, agents from the FBI's Philadelphia field office, a U.S. marshal and North Carolina Gov. Michael Easley.

Matthews claims that the document, which he says is worth $30 million on the private market, was improperly seized by the U.S. Attorney's office in 2003


http://wfsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=4635144
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GardeningGal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't understand why it was seized.
Was there some question of ownership? If not, seems pretty straightforward to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Since they are rare documents, I am
assuming the government wants it for posterity... I believe this guy is entitled to this document, unless the government wants to reimburse him for it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GardeningGal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed.
If he acquired his ownership legally, if the government wants it they should pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. This storyline was on West Wing a couple of years ago
when the parties wanted the white house to intervene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC