Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scalia: "sexual orgies eliminate tension and ought to be encouraged"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:06 AM
Original message
Scalia: "sexual orgies eliminate tension and ought to be encouraged"

What a lewd, crude remark!





Scalia decried his own court's recent overturning of a state anti-sodomy law, joking that he personally believes "sexual orgies eliminate tension and ought to be encouraged," but said a panel of judges is not inherently qualified to determine the morality of such behavior.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/15/AR2006031502798.html?nav=rss_nation/special








Discussion of the substance of his remarks is here >

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x674798

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. They are all perverts......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeunderdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. That explains why we all feel like we're constantly getting
fucked by a bunch of Republicans.

Now i get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. Question: Do taxpayers provide cable TV to offices of him & Thomas?
If so, can we get an audit of just what channels we are buying for them> ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. SCOTUS promotes Orgies - Film at 11 !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. nice sausage fingers, Tony
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. fingers like those are indicators of serious health issues
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'd have to agree completely
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 11:11 AM by shadowknows69
having been fortunate enough to have been in one or two. I felt no tension. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpgamerd00d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. One or two ? Which was it? You can't tell me you'd forget !!
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 11:12 AM by rpgamerd00d
And why wasn't I invited ?!?!?!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. ok one and a half
it depends on how many people constitute an orgy and on what the definition of what the word "is" is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Orgy - description
More than 4 people

3= Threesome
4=Foursome
5=Orgy

imho :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Ok revision
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 11:25 AM by shadowknows69
does the group of 5 or more have to include 2 men and 2 women or does me and 4 women count as an orgy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. Enter Jeff Gannon/Guckert...? -- [LITTERALY!]
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. No thanks
not there's anything wrong with that but....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Good Lord! now ya made me look it up...
or·gy ( P ) Pronunciation Key (ôrj)
n. pl. or·gies
1.A revel involving unrestrained indulgence, especially sexual activity.
2.Uncontrolled or immoderate indulgence in an activity: an orgy of spending. See Synonyms at binge.
3.A secret rite in the cults of ancient Greek or Roman deities, typically involving frenzied singing, dancing, drinking, and sexual activity.

was there ouzo involved? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. I don't know but I'd like to hang out with you.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #21
44. I Believe... That If It's More Than 2...
And everybody walks away satisfied and OK with themselves and each other, it's an orgy. Course... it's more likely to be a fantasy than an orgy, but that's because doing it well is so rare.

According to the books I've studied.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeStl Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. yeah
I think the lewd and crude comes into play in picturing Scalia being at said event ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. It's a funny remark, but the entire statement demonstrates the difference
between Repub and Dem beliefs in government, rights and the Constitution. He's saying that judges shouldn't decide the morality of sexual issues, but he's saying that it's okay to legislate and restrict them nonetheless. A Dem would say that neither a judge nor a legislator should decide someone else's morality, and it is the role of the courts to protect the people from legislators who try to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. He must be getting advice from John Bolton and Jeff Gannon
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 11:12 AM by SpiralHawk
Clarence Thomas: "Oh yes. You can bet your Long Dong on it. As an expert on pubic hairs on Coke cans, I concur"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. ewwwww!
if angelina jolie said that, ok. but not that slimy guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mondo joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
10. Ew! Just imagine his little breakfast-sausage-fingers caressing you.
Or worse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeStl Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. hmm..
no wonder I'm so tense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JunkYardDogg Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. Rove & Gannon Argued to Overturn the AntiSodomy Law
Didn't they say that it would negatively impact the GOP (Hard) CORE Hierarchy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevinbgoode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
15. Let's see...Thomas was accused of sexual harassment
and I believe Scalia once refused to answer a question about whether he has participated in sodomy with his wife.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. I knew he's said this before:
http://www.lawschool.com/scaliasex.htm


Scalia Discusses Orgies and Sex

(10-01) 12:40 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's recent speeches have ventured into some surprising territory, with the staunchly conservative father of nine joking about sexual orgies.

Scalia is known for a biting humor and is entertaining on the talk circuit and on the bench during the court's argument sessions.

He raised some eyebrows with a speech this week at Harvard University, however, with a comment about the number of people needed for group sex and the jest that "sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged."

He made a similar remark in a speech Sept. 20 in Washington, to chuckles from the crowd at the conservative Ethics and Public Policy Center, while making the point that judges can have personal moral judgments. It is not judges' role to impose them on citizens, he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A Simple Game Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. "sexual orgies eliminate social tensions
and ought to be encouraged."

The Roman Empire did last a long time.

I do have one thing to say about Scalia though. I will see the guest list before I go to the next orgy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. Dufus is disseminating a fundamentally
wrong view of the role of the courts and the legislature. What was it Tony was doing on that trip with DeadEye?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. That will come in handy when he's visiting Cheney in prison
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveColorado Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. It's none of my damn business whether Scalia has sodomy with his wife


Unfortunately, Tony doesn't have the same respect for me and my personal affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. He's holier than thou. Except when he's not.
Seriously, how do the fundies take stuff like this? What if Bill Clinton said it? Or Sandra Day O'Connor? Or even Clarence Thomas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
23. So when does he get a censure
from the Vatican? None of our people ADVOCATE immorality, yet this Nuremberg blue plate Catholic special would support the punishment of selective people for selective sins with the Vatican's approval and make exceptions for Roman style decadence of the lowest character.

But to get to the point, this hugely suggests, and even boasts of personal experience and current behavior by himself and some circle jerk of friends. You don't talk like this unless you are either trying to bluff out your secret life a la Senator "Monkey Business" Hart or are just too personally immoral to see anything wrong with one's personal preferences. Has no one dared ask of his personal experience? Come on!

Maybe it would be safer if Bill Bennett and he were in a therapy group because with their different proclivities it wouldn't devolve into a sex therapy session.

Scalia: "I'll bet you'll like this better than gambling."

Bennett: "You're on, your honor!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. That was fucking GENIUS!
GENIUS, I tell ya!

MORE ORGIES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reverend_Smitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. it's not often you find yourself agreeing with Scalia...
but when he's right...he's right...lol Just as long as he is not involved in the orgy :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Sounds like he speaks from personal experience!
It does quote him as "personally" believing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. Got to admit, Gannon/Guckert was at the WH 200+ times baby!!
With absolutely NO background checks??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
34. Who would want to get in a orgy with him...
yuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Well, the Supreme Court does meet in private...
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 11:56 PM by Marie26
double yuck!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. Who would want to get in a orgy with him? >Bush & Gonzo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. kick for the late night crowd.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
37. Where's James Dobson, Tony Perkins, and the rest of that ilk
When you really need them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. Wonder what Scalia's sexual preferences are - he looks like, well you know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. Scalia can't even get it up anymore at his age and weight so I know he
wasn't too serious--hopeful, maybe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. Scalia needs spray starch to get it up
along with his Cialis for his 36-hour orgies :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. Panel of judges does not have to determine morality of behavior.
It's immoral to prohibit the behavior. Strawman alert! Let the individual be responsible for his morality.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
43. But contraception would be wrong? No Plan B?
Twisty logic.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
45. Could you imagine being in that orgy....
And catching Scalia.....


Yeeeshhhh!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. Republican and Party are two words that just do NOT go together. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
48. GROSS!!!
"Scalia" and "sexual orgies," both mentioned together!!! :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC