Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Senate votes debt limit hike to $8.965 trillion(52-48)repubs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:51 AM
Original message
US Senate votes debt limit hike to $8.965 trillion(52-48)repubs
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:37 PM by cal04
The U.S. Senate on Thursday approved a $781 billion increase in U.S. borrowing authority aimed at averting a possible government default on debt this month. The Senate voted 52-48 to raise the federal debt limit to $8.965 trillion. The measure, the fourth time the cap has been raised since 2002, now goes to U.S. President George W. Bushfor signing into law.

Before the vote, the Republican-controlled Senate defeated a move by Democrats to amend the legislation. Had Democrats been successful, they would have forced the U.S. House of Representatives to vote on the bill before recessing on Thursday for more than a week. The House approved the debt limit increase nearly a year ago, when it passed a fiscal 2006 budget blueprint. The Senate amendment, by Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat, would have required a study on the impact of rapidly-growing foreign-held debt.


(snip at the bottom)
No Democrats voted for raising the debt limit, leaving Republicans with casting the politically-difficult vote in favor of increased borrowing. Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said the rapid run-up in U.S. debt since 2002 was because of the "reckless fiscal policies of this president" and because of a Republican-controlled Congress that he said is a "rubber stamp" of Bush's initiatives.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060316/pl_nm/economy_debt_dc_2
roll call vote
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=109&session=2&vote=00054

R's that didn't vote for it
Ensign (R-NV),Coburn (R-OK),Burns (R-MT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Grassley was going to vote No; which other R's did?
Not to mention any sniveling DINOs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shoelace414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. the Debt celing MUST be raised
without it global economies would crash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. No, it doesn't. Removing the tax cuts to the wealthy
would work just fine, it seems.

"The measure allows the government to pay for the war in Iraq and finance Medicare and other big federal programs without raising taxes."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/03/16/national/w083917S55.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
30. Absolutely unbelievable.
These guys are running the government like the world is going to end next week. I can't believe their talking about lowering taxes while raising the debt. "we won't tax you, we'll just give you money and start charging your children for it with interest". That's what it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. It is simply prolonging the inevitable
And making the inevitable crash all that much more worse. What is going on here is that the 'Pugs are drawing this out, hoping that the crash won't come on Bush's watch, but on the watch of the next Dem in office. Thus they can blame whoever that is. It is a strategy that might even work.

But folks, we're going to be in for some real rough times. Inflation is going to rise in direct proportion to this, and the economic crash that is barreling down the road towards us is going to make the Great Depression look like the Roaring Twenties. Prepare yourself for this crisis if you can. Pay down your debt, start growing your own food, invest in making yourself energy self sufficient. Get yourself out of the markets ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Grassley voted 'Yea' - Burns, Coburn, and Ensign voted 'Nay.'
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 01:10 PM by TahitiNut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is that 52 Repug 48 Dem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Can I get a roll call?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Not up yet...keep checking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Roll call is up!
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:22 PM by Career Prole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. (Just posted by Senate) Here ya go ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Coburn was the third R voting Nay
I must have been confused about Grassley. :freak:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Good catch. I scanned it at least 3 times and missed Coburn each time.
(D'uh!) :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. i watched it live, i think every dem that was there voted nay.
and every republican "voted in the affirmative"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. roll call
voting no

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Burns (R-MT)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Ensign (R-NV)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Wyden (D-OR)

voting aye
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chafee (R-RI)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Collins (R-ME)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Enzi (R-WY)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Edit: Burns, Coburn and Ensign, eh?
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:31 PM by tasteblind
Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. is Ensign up for re-election this year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Yes.
"Nevada (Ensign-R) - Ensign and fellow Nevada Sen. Harry Reid (D) have a storied working relationship, and the two are said to have a pact not to campaign against one another. In spite of that, it appears that Jack Carter, son of President Jimmy Carter, may challenge Ensign. Without Reid's help, Carter would have an uphill battle, but he could make it interesting. Oct. 5"

http://www.modernvertebrate.com/elections/2006-national/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. hmm, thats interesting. I read somewhere that Ensings father actually
voted for reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. its the REPUBLICAN debt. always mention who owns the debt
and of course that the republicans are penalizing your grandchildren's grandchildren, the...republican birth tax.

Msongs
www.msongs.com/democratsmugs.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sadly, we ALL own the debt.
That's why it's such a travesty that Republicans have instituted it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Over $30,000 per person in America
That is your portion of the debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Can I put it on my Visa?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If your limit is high enough........
you see WE CAN'T raise our OWN debt limit whenever we want, we're supposed to live within our means. The same doesn't apply to the Republican controlled government. They wouldn't qualify for bankruptcy under the new laws, either, They'd have to pay down their debt little by little until the debt was paid. Of course, their credit rating would be destroyed in the process as well.

People learn by watching, and watching their government run up huge deficits seems to give them permission to do it themselves. The only thing is, there are two sets of rules and OUR set of rules whacks us in the ass when WE do it. bush's credit card bill is staggering, unfortunately the entire country has to pay it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sheelz Donating Member (869 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. That's without interest.
I believe the Thom Hatrtmann put it just below 200,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. going up at over $100,000.00 per second
:shrug; That is some spending spree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. There is no republican revolt in congress. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. 8.965 - how cute - why don't they just make it 9
Because maybe it will look bad - why even have a limit if they're going to keep raising the damn thing :grr: My level of frustration and disbelief and anger with this administration rises each day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. wow, pretty serious move
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 12:23 PM by quinnox
by the Democrats, if the Republicans had had 2 or 3 defections the government would have gone into default and brought on a worldwide crash/depression. Maybe the Dems knew all the Repubs would vote yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. It's the old NOT TWENTY DOLLARS ONLY 19.99!!!
Same horseshit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC