Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dean: Bush Losing His Security Blanket....The War in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:19 PM
Original message
Dean: Bush Losing His Security Blanket....The War in Iraq
http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/03/dean_bush_losin.php

Washington, DC - Three years after Vice President Cheney said that American troops would be greeted as liberators, the American military today is engaging in the largest air strikes since the war began. It is no wonder new polls confirm that the American people are continuing to lose confidence in the President's ability to lead the nation. President Bush's approval rating has hit 37 percent in the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll and 33 percent in the new Pew Research Center for the People and the Press poll.

The American people are particularly fed up with President Bush's commitment to a failed strategy in Iraq. According to the NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll, 61 percent disapprove of Bush's handling of the war in Iraq.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11843383/from/RSS/

Pew Center, 3/15/06,
http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=271]

This public dissatisfaction is also a problem for Congressional Republicans facing re-election this year, as merely 37 percent of Americans want Congress to be controlled by the GOP.

"It's no wonder the American people continue to lose confidence in President Bush's incompetent policies both at home and abroad," said Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean. "From his commitment to a failed strategy in Iraq, to an inept policy that allowed Iran to become a major threat and North Korea to acquire even more nuclear weapons, President Bush's failure to address the real threats to our homeland is undermining Americans' security. Americans want a change, not more of the same bad choices and failed agenda. Democrats have a bolder vision for a secure America."

See below for a new document from DNC Research:

THREE YEARS LATER, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND OUR TROOPS DESERVE HONEST LEADERSHIP ON THE WAR IN IRAQ

Just a sample from the link
http://www.democrats.org/a/2006/03/dean_bush_losin.php

IRAQ IS NOT WHERE OSAMA IS

"This war reached our shores on September 11, 2001."


IRAQ WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR 9/11

BUSH
"No, we've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th."

RICE
"...We have never claimed that Saddam Hussein had either, that Saddam Hussein had either direction or control of 9/11."


And a lot more research.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R.
Be The Bu$h Opposition - 24/7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes, don't let up on it.
You are right. Thanks for the R and the K.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
I K&R anything and all that Dean is doing. Ditto Hackett. And, now Feingold.

DEAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good research. Quotes on the number of Iraqis trained. Amazing spin.
BUT HOW MANY TROOPS HAVE BEEN TRAINED?

FEBRUARY 2004: Rumsfeld said the number of Iraqis serving in the security forces was over 210,000, and that the number may grow to over 226,000 by April.


SEPTEMBER 2004: Rumsfeld drastically drops the number of trained troops, saying in a briefing that the "latest number, last week was 105,000. Now it looks to be 95,000 - that is to say that are trained and equipped."


FEBRUARY 2005: Rumsfeld changes the number again, saying that "...the fact of the matter is that there are 130,2000 who have been trained and equipped...That's a fact. And how do I know that? I know it because General Petraeus counts them."


JUNE 2005: Rumsfeld changes the number again, saying that "The fact of the matter is the number's 168,000."


JULY 2005: General George Casey Jr., who oversees U.S. forces in Iraq, told Congress that only three of the approximately 100 Iraqi army battalions are taking on the insurgents by themselves. Three battalions is approximately 700 soldiers.


NOVEMBER 2005: Bush said that "40 Iraqi battalions are taking the lead in the fight." He said a battalion is typically comprised of "between 350 and 800 Iraqi forces," which would bring the latest estimate of fully trained Iraqi troops to somewhere between 14,000 and 32,000.


DECEMBER 2005: When Bush was asked how many Iraqi troops were now able to stand alone without the backing of U.S. troops, he said there were "about 200,000-plus capable" forces. He continued by saying that "Now, not all of them are ready to take the fight to the enemy."

MARCH 2006: Bush said that "60 Iraqi battalions are taking the lead in the fight." He previously said a battalion is typically comprised of "between 350 and 800 Iraqi forces," which would bring the latest estimate of fully trained Iraqi troops to somewhere between 21,000 and 48,000.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. Dean really should be nicer, use more diplomacy with George Bush
NOT!!!

Kick it Howie, give 'em an' ow-ie! KICK IT!!!KICK IT GOOD!!! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC