What will Bush's numbers be AFTER the warrantless physical searches info

[liveoaktx]

comes out? How low can he go? I don't think ANYONE is gonna go for having their offices or homes searched without a warrant (well, maybe a few koolaid drinkers, that same percentage that thinks Saddam did 9/11)

[leftchick]

1. how will it come out with no hearings?

:shrug:

[napi21]

2. Supposed to be a story in US News & World Report on Mon, and

it will be up on their web site tomorrow night. I'd BET it will be a topic on cspan's WJ Sun, Mon, or Tues. too.

If it makes enough noise, it ust might hit the MSM too.

[Warren DeMontague]

4. Ah. Hmmm. With specifics? nt

[liveoaktx]

8. VIDEO from KO

Turley

[leftchick]

13. omg! I missed that

That was simply stunning. Perhaps the senate will be shamed into having hearings now!

[Warren DeMontague]

3. Uh, if you mean we're ever gonna get any REAL answers as to

who was being spied on illegally, and why-- man, I hope you're right, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

[liveoaktx]

7. I believe it is slowly seeping into people.... Americans do NOT

want to be spied on. And I think when they find out the Bush administration wanted to do warrantless physical searches of people and DID SO IN AT LEAST ONE CASE, they aren't gonna like it.

I look forward to below 30-maybe Bush will match Cheney.

[Kansas Wyatt]

5. If the warrantless wiretaps hit people upside the head like a 2 x 4

And woke them up, this is going to really piss them off. They barely held the last episode together enough to prevent an investigation.

But, in all fairness, BushCo & Republicans, Inc. are setting many precedents for the anti-gun liberal opposed to extreme right wing groups, who will be the next President of the United States.:rofl:

[windy252]

6. I hate to say it

but I think you underestimate the blindness of some people.

[salin]

9. I have completely missed your reference

??? Conjecture - or brewing story?

[kainah]

10. brewing story

apparently US News and World Report will have a story online tomorrow night -- and on newstands Monday -- saying that Bushites were justifying warrantless physical searches in addition to the wiretapping. One terrorism suspect's lawyer says his (the lawyer's) office and home were searched without a warrant.

Keith Olberman has a segment on it with Jonathan Turley.

[salin]

12. I am lost

how does a story, that justifies searching the lawyer's home without a warrant, bolster the position that such searches are justified? Or is it another example of bushco ineptness - try to frame a justification that simply raises more suspicions?

[williesgirl]

11. See this thread - has video - more info available online at US News

I think on Saturday


http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x690887