Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH SIGNED WRONG BILL?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
auagroach Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:26 AM
Original message
BUSH SIGNED WRONG BILL?
BUSH SIGNED WRONG BILL?

Friday, March 17, 2006 - FreeMarketNews.com

http://www.freemarketnews.com/WorldNews.asp?nid=9627

Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) has alleged in a letter to White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card that a bill President Bush signed this past February was not the version that passed the House of Representatives, according to an account at Raw Story.

The bill in question, the Deficit Reduction Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 2005, had gone through several revisions during the deliberations.

In addition, Waxman claims the Speaker of the House may have called President Bush before he signed the law, telling him he had the wrong version of the bill. The article notes that if this is true, it would put the President in willful violation of the U.S. Constitution. - ST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nah, he signed the one they intended.
Those crooks just hoped they'd get away with this small con- nobody would notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. So bush...were ya so stupid ya signed the wrong bill, or did ya AGAIN
violate the USC?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm betting on the latter. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. With bush, it could very well be both.
So stupid he signed the wrong bill instead of the willfully-violated-the-USC bill he meant to sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freedom_from_Chains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. That's true also EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulsakatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. wow!!
Very interesting.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. To * the Constitution was created to be violated
Who's gonna stop him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
21. Yikes! What a pair of knockers, 'eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Er, it's not really me. I'm much scarier looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. he did indeed
but they'll simply shrug it off (and in fact HAVE, iirc) as a 'clerical error'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Too knowingly sign the wrong bill is a crime!!!
This has NEVER happened before!!! This is just in your face I'm going to do what I damn well want...

and the Republicans are part of this!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auagroach Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Word of the day
insolence

n 1: the trait of being rude and impertinent; inclined to take liberties 2: an offensive disrespectful impudent act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. this is easily resolved under the constitution
the bill he signed was not passed by the house, and therefore is not law. the president can sign any unpassed law he wants, it doesn't mean squat.

the bill both houses of congress DID pass went more than 10 days neither signed nor vetoed, and is therefore automatically law, unless congress adjourned during those 10 days, in which case it is "pocket vetoed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I prefer the other USC remedy...
High crimes and misdemeanors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. WOW! How did you know that?
This is why I spend 12/day on DU...Just smart people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. my mother went to law school while i was in high school.
i learned quite a lot helping her study and/or just reading her textbooks (i was always such a nerd.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. WOW! He KNEW!!
quote.........
According to representative Henry Waxman, Bush signed into law a version of the Budget Reconciliation Act that didn't pass Congress. The discrepancy between the version Bush signed and the actual bill that passed equates to a value of $2 billion.

Bush knew he was directly violating the Constitution and effectively acting as a despot because he received a call from the Speaker of the House before signing the bill, warning him that it had not been passed.
end quote.........
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/180306bushsigns.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. Does that cover what he did, though?
From what I read, I sounds like he was personally informed, and then signed it anyway. That's a wilful violation, and in itself (because of his advance notice and subsequent signing) additionally indicates the president believes he can pass any law he wishes, will he, nil he.

That to me is a high crime- not the fact that he signed a meaningless law, but that he did so knowingly, and with the belief it would be law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. well, seeing as impeachment is a political device,
it can be used for whatever congress decides.

if congress decides it rises to the level of high crimes and misdemeanors, then it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. great history/constitutional lesson unblock!
I'm shocked by how many people don't know these basic facts about how laws are made!

It's all right there in print. Of course, for people who are allergic to reading, there's always Schoolhouse Rock..."I'm only a bill, yes I'm only a bill..." :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrspeeker Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
10. throw another shrimp on the barbi
and give the old chap another 45 days to sign whatever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
14. Pretzeldent can't safely ride a bicycle....
and you are annoyed that he signed the wrong bill? :)

Seriously though, this Administration maintained that no one expected the levees to break, until video proved different. They hide the truth, lie and have claimed unlimited, unchecked authority as Commander-in-Chief in the War on Terror. I don't trust them and neither should Rep. Waxman.

Keep up the good work Rep. Waxman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. Barney Fife does it again
WTF is next?
Disease outbreak???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
16. Don't count on Congress to do anything about it...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. when the lights go on
the cockroaches scatter for cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. THAT IS THE TRUTH nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
26. This is .... is ..... is..... no fucking words for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC