Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Dividing the Nation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:34 PM
Original message
Newsweek: Dividing the Nation
Edited on Sat Mar-18-06 12:40 PM by cal04
President Bush’s approval rating has dropped to new lows on domestic issues and public anger is rising over his handling of Iraq and homeland security, according to NEWSWEEK’s latest poll.

A bitterly divided electorate gives President George W. Bush an approval rating of only 36 percent in the latest NEWSWEEK poll, matching the low point in his presidency recorded last November. His image as an effective leader in the war on terror is tarnished, with less than half the public (44 percent) approving of the way he’s handling terrorism and homeland security. Despite a series of presidential speeches meant to bolster support for the war in Iraq, as well as the announcement of a major military offensive when the poll was getting under way, only 29 percent of the people questioned approved Bush’s handling of the situation in Iraq. Fully 65 percent disapprove. The way the president has dealt with issues at home hasn't brought him much support either.

His approval ratings for the handling of energy policy (28 percent) and health care (28 percent) were new lows, while approval on the economy (36 percent) mirrored his overall rating. The single area where President Bush accrued more approval than disapproval was in his appointments to the Supreme Court, which 47 percent approved. The outright anger against Bush felt by many Americans was reflected in responses to questions about the effort of Democratic Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin to censure Bush in Congress for his warrantless wiretapping program. Feingold has found very little support for his move on the Hill. Four in 10 (42 percent) of the adults in the general public say they would support Congressional censure of the president, while half (50 percent) say they would not. Censure wins majority support from Democrats (60 percent) and one in five Republicans (20 percent) say they’d support it.


Yet if Democrats in Congress do decide to push for such a measure, they may run into trouble with that same public. By a margin of 53 percent to 33 percent, Americans feel the censure proposal was made as a partisan ploy, not for reasons of principle. In today’s strongly polarized political climate, roughly one in four American adults (26 percent) say they think Congress should actually impeach President Bush and consider removing him from office. There is in fact no effort to do this on the Hill, and the public mood appears to be more a reflection of the passionate sentiment against Bush in some quarters rather than considered support for actual legislative action. (Some recent national polls show about 45 percent of adults strongly disapprove of the president’s performance.) The NEWSWEEK poll shows that only 5 percent of Republicans would support impeaching Bush, while 94 percent would not. Among Democrats, almost half (49 percent) support impeachment, while 48 percent oppose it. Overall, 69 percent do not think Congress should consider removing him from office.

(snip)
This is the third of four NEWSWEEK polls taken since September 2005 showing the Democrats with a double-digit lead. The Democrats never had such an advantage in any NEWSWEEK poll conducted before the last two off-year Congressional elections, 2002 and 1998. The Democrats now lead in Congressional vote preferences of Independents by 47 percent to 31 percent. Key to the election outcome is whether the Democrats’ big advantage with independent voters will be maintained and how many of these voters will actually turn out in November.
more
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11894249/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. 36% approval indicates "divided"? It shows we're united. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The Corporate Media sees us as "divided."
Not "united," as that would mean we were/are uniting against their chief patron, King George the Torturer.

I find it ironic that the Corporate Media is hugely responsible for Coup2000. Yet, even when confronted with the facts, they continue to spin in their leader's favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. LOL, you're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
linazelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yep--divide means 50/50. That is NOT the case. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, 50/50 Is Called A "Mandate" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. Hey, it's BITTERLY divided
But I guess that's the kind of trash talk to be expected when it's still popular to beat up Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Ya set there thinkin' that man'll change
Edited on Sat Mar-18-06 12:39 PM by Warpy
but the sucker just keeps on stayin' the same.
You gotta dump that chump"---------Saffire

Eventually the battered spouses who keep coming back, hoping he means what he says and it's the last beating, the last time they'll be let down, the last abuse of their trust, will realize that he is what he is and support getting him the hell out of office.

He didn't belong there in the first place, and we didn't elect him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't worry, the dem leadership will figure out a way to fuck up the lead
Edited on Sat Mar-18-06 12:43 PM by Rabrrrrrr
both in terms of turning it into a negative lead, and also failing to take any advantage of the lead at all while they have it, and leave the republicans standing high and mighty after the elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Well, that redefines the concept of the "me-too" party, big-time...
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. That's why they can claim 60/40 is bitterly divided
As long as the "base" keeps bashing the Democrats, there's no reason for the media to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oh, gosh, I'm so sorry for not turning a blind eye to the dem leadership
Edited on Sun Mar-19-06 06:24 AM by Rabrrrrrr
tactics or lack thereof, and actually daring to assume that I am allowed, as a member of the movement, to speak for what I believe.

From now on, I shall act the proper Hitlerjugend role for the party, obediently following my orders and obsequiously receiving my speaking points, hopefully with a look of religious fervor on my face, and never ever questioning or criticizing our leadership again.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Don't please don't push the censure, please don't critice poor
bush... what is wrong with these people? Oh never mind we know what side their bread is buttered... there, good, can I have another one? This time use Jelly though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Damn right, Newsweek is dividing the nation
That's why we need to boycott Newsweek and only read NR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. NR?
TNR? The New Republic? Bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. What did they say when the numbers were the other way?
When Bush had approval ratings in the 60s and disapproval in the 30s, did a single media outlet talk about the divided nation then?

No, of course not, anyone who didn't bow to the Boy King was marginalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lanah Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. looks like we're united to me
more and more of us have had enough of these bastards!

Now hold them accountable already!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC