BEWARE major RANT..Before we flame someone for........

[Minnesota Libra]

.....something we consider :tinfoilhat: these days we need to back up a mile or two.:rant:

Remember that if someone had said twenty or twenty-five years ago our elections could be stolen right out from under our noses - without any evidence at all - we would probably have at the very least labeled them :tinfoilhat: and probably flamed them into the next decade.

Well, look how things have changed. As we discovered through some hellish experiences, stealing elections can be done in a matter of minutes not days. Our USSC can now appoint our Presidents instead of the popular vote and Electoral College handling the matter, as was the practice.

So when someone writes something like this.......
My God, I've FINALLY figured out Bush and the High Neocons
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x700600

...at least read it and consider the possibility. Having the common courtesy to read and consider information DOES NOT mean we automatically have to agree with it. It simply means we might have one more bit of information at our disposal to figure out what the enemy is in the process of using against us.

Now, if anyone wants to flame me for this go for it and :banghead:. I just turned the stereo up to drowned out the sound.:bounce: :bounce:

One last thing, remember "Area 51" that was :tinfoilhat: at one time too.

Now :nuke: away............

[valerief]

1. It was about 25 years that I was told I was a lunatic for even

considering that big elections could be rigged. I was told (by my boss's son) it was impossible. I think of him often nowadays.

[Minnesota Libra]

2. Yup, so I don't dismiss anything out of the relm of possibilities. nt

[maddezmom]

3. locking

Do not start a new topic in order to continue a flame war or call out a member from another discussion thread.