Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jack Cafferty's 7pm question on lazy congresscritters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:16 PM
Original message
Jack Cafferty's 7pm question on lazy congresscritters
he asks if
7 p.m. ET: Should the House of Representatives be in session for more than 97 days a year?

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/situation.room/

my response:
Perish the thought. They do enough harm to American just in the few days they do work: The patriot act, the Iraqi invasion, and much more. Haven't they done enough damage? If they were to work full time, our country would be even worse off. WE are much safe while they are off taking their bribes, traveling on overseas junkets and going to play golf in foreign lands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, they shouldn't.
And anyone who thinks they don't work when Congress isn't in session needs a serious education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Dick Durbin stated that he spent 70% of each day fundraising
I assume that other senators are the same, and since the congresscritters have so much more competition, they have to work even harder for their bread, bribes, etc.

If the a GOP held congress spent that 70% concocting new plans, tax cuts, and limitations on civil rights, abortion and privacy, we would be much worse off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. congress
should be in session at least 200 days. the deal about money and fund raising should be public money for elections and no fund raising at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I still wouldn't be fine with that.
No one understands how much they do in their districts non-fundraising wise. I'd have them in session one more day a week, tops, and one fewer recess. That's it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. 97 days seems ample time
After all, how long does it take to rubber-stamp something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Mine
"It's a dilemma. While they do less damage if we limit the time they spend in session, the prostitution rate increases every time they go out whoring for funds."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. But it will take lots of overtime
To even start to undo the damage. Even if the Democrats take control of both Houses this year, anything that even attempts to repair the damage will face veto. But at least we can start some serious investigations and stop passing bills that increase the misery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. GOOD response!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC