Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did you know: Saddam offered to surrender before the war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 10:53 PM
Original message
Did you know: Saddam offered to surrender before the war?
I wrote this dkos diary a year ago... and it's even more relevant now.

Now that Bush's WMD stories have been proven to be 100% "dead wrong," -- even to the extent Bush has had to admit it, after struggling for months to keep hope alive...

And now that 53% of the public believes the war was not worth the cost...

I think this is an ideal moment to widely publicize the fact that Saddam offered to surrender, almost a total capitulation, before the war. He offered to let thousands of US troops into the country to search for WMD, and even offered to hold monitored elections in two years.

But Bush and Cheney both personally refused these offers and took America to war. They could have had everything the war achieved -- confirmation of no WMD and elections in two years -- for no cost, and they preferred war!

I think it's time to discuss that decision. To force Bush and Cheney to explain that decision. And that can be done, if the blogosphere picks up the story.

Source: Guardian United, Saddam's desperate offers to stave off war
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1079769,00.html

Washington dismissed Iraq's peace feelers, including elections and weapons pledge, put forward via diplomatic channels and US hawk Perle

Julian Borger in Washington, Brian Whitaker and Vikram Dodd
Friday November 7, 2003
The Guardian

In the few weeks before its fall, Iraq's Ba'athist regime made a series of increasingly desperate peace offers to Washington, promising to hold elections and even to allow US troops to search for banned weapons. But the advances were all rejected by the Bush administration, according to intermediaries involved in the talks.

...

Iraqi intelligence was also offering privately to allow several thousand US troops into the country to take part in the search for banned weapons.

Baghdad even proposed staging internationally-monitored elections within two years.

"All these offers had at bottom the same thing - that Saddam would stay in power, and that was unacceptable to the administration," Mr Cannistraro said. "There were serious attempts to cut a deal but they were all turned down by the president and vice president."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, I remember.
Shameful and despicable insistence on war. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well let's get a buzz going! K&R!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. there wasn't nearly enough $$$ to made in him surrendering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I remember. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, I remember. Saddam should mention this at his trial.
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 11:00 PM by cantstandbush
It did not suit the neocon/PNAC agenda to have Saddam surrender and for Iraq to form a stable and responsible government in peace.

Shouldn't it be a war crime to refuse to accept the peaceful surrender of your enemy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. They chose what to try Saddam on carefully
It's a very specific incident which had nothing to do with the USA or the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Nothing could stop the warmongers from having their war. K/R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. I believe he also challenged Mr. Bush to a duel. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Seriously, or are you joking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Seriously, he did -- here's a link

W.H. rejects Bush-Saddam duel offer
Thursday, October 3, 2002

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The White House scorned an Iraqi leader's suggestion that President Bush and Saddam Hussein could resolve their differences in a duel, calling it an "irresponsible statement" that did not justify a "serious response."

(more at link)
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/10/03/iraq.bush.duel/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. I also remember this...
Once 9/11 came there was nothing on earth that could have stopped this invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brothaman2k Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Don't be fooled
9/11 happend so they COULD have this invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. No fools around here! Welcome to DU!
Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, I did - but I'm recommending as we need a reminder.
The MSM hasn't mentioned that - huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is new info to me
thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
11. I knew that...... but we had to get our Permanent Bases built
so....... whatever. It is sooo old news as to be nostalgic... the good old days of EFFECTIVE propaganda....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. Re "permanent bases"
Bushco recently renamed them "long term access bases".
So now they can say they are not "permanent".
More deception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. And bush said Saddam could remain in power if he disarmed.
"If military action proves necessary, it will be to uphold the authority of the UN and to ensure Saddam is disarmed of his weapons of mass destruction, not to overthrow him. It is why, detestable as I find his regime, he could stay in power if he disarms peacefully."

http://www.sundayherald.com/print31827

Bush: March 5, 2003

"We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq. But if Saddam Hussein does not disarm peacefully, he will be disarmed by force,"

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030308-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks for reminding me.
I remember hearing that on Public Radio and thinking it could stop the coming war, if someone would just make a big deal out of SH's bid and demand a strategic response to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. I remember Bush giving Saddam
and his sons 48 hours to leave the country or be invaded.

I was telling everyone on DU not to worry because at the last minute Saddam would fly to the mansion next to Idi Amin's in Saudi Arabia where he could plot his comeback.

I bet he wished he followed my advice.

By the way I have lots more predictions almost as good as that one was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. yes I do remember that.
Edited on Mon Mar-20-06 11:32 PM by mmonk
But shock and awe wasn't just aimed at Iraq. It was aimed at the world (to induce fear in the middle eastern countries). There was going to be war no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. but he had to admit to wmd's
"According to an Arab source, Mr Perle sent a Saudi official a set of requirements he believed Iraq would have to fulfil. Those demands included Saddam's abdication and departure, first to a US military base for interrogation and then into supervised exile, a surrender of Iraqi troops, and the admission that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. "


the only wmd i am aware of sits in the oval office.
dp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. It's very valuable to review these basic facts, after the maelstrom
we've been living through.

Thank you for re-posting this. This kind of thing is crucial to getting the history straight in the minds of a nation shell-shocked by 9/11, the Afghanistan war, and the fevered drive to go to Iraq.

Rec'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-20-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bush wanted to invade Iraq according to his biographer
Houston: Two years before the September 11 attacks, presidential candidate George W. Bush was already talking privately about the political benefits of attacking Iraq, according to his former ghost writer, who held many conversations with then-Texas Governor Bush in preparation for a planned autobiography.

“He was thinking about invading Iraq in 1999,” said author and journalist Mickey Herskowitz. “It was on his mind. He said to me: ‘One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief.’ And he said, ‘My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it.’ He said, ‘If I have a chance to invade….if I had that much capital, I’m not going to waste it. I’m going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I’m going to have a successful presidency.”

http://www.gnn.tv/articles/article.php?id=761

Did you catch that? "If I have a chance to invade..." Does that sound like someone who would avoid war at all costs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freefall Donating Member (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yes, I knew that. Didn't matter. The neo-cons were going to invade Iraq no
matter what. This was evident months before the war.

Peace,

freefall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
23. Yes, the UAE brokered the deal
Hussein wanted guarantees and international assurances, including a resolution by the Arab League giving its approval for his exile, the senior official said.

News of the reported offer from the UAE emerged last week during an interview broadcast by the Arab network Al-Arabiya with Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahayan, the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, one of the United Arab Emirates.

The offer was spearheaded by his father, then-UAE President Sheikh Zayed Ben Sultan Al Nahayan, who died November 3. (Full story)

"During those days, the circumstances we worked under needed a very swift decision, an immediate response," the crown prince said in a documentary broadcast by the network.

"We had secured the approval of the main players, everyone who was involved, and the man concerned -- Saddam Hussein -- in 24 hours," he said. "So we came to the summit to lay down all the facts at the conference table. There would have been results if the issues were brought up but, again, this is all part of the past right now."... http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/11/02/saddam.exile/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dragonbreathp9d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
25. Jesus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atomic-fly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Mother F**kers!
I'm so apalled by this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. I have never forgotten.
This is one of the reasons Bush is a war-mongering idiot in my book and always will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. We couldn't have allowed that to happen, then we wouldn't have
the mechanism for fear and perpetual war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
30. REALLY timely. Please spread around to KO, others. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. yeah, but the PNAC plan calls for "Large Wars"
Mission #2 of the Four Essential Missions of the U.S. military...multiple large wars, in fact. If we don't aggressively pursue such wars, how are we going to fulfill that mission? It's all part of, you know, Rebuilding America's Defenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. Kerry said this during the campaign and media treated it as if he was
not serious.

NO discussion by broadcast media - as if the charge never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. Judy Miller was
too far into the bullshit spreading mission for Little Boots. They were busy planting those nuke parts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
34. Yes, and I was flabbergasted when the Bush regime told
him it was too late for him to surrender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Yes I did know that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yes.
And the last time I posted that fact, I was only attacked and called a "Saddam lover" by 2 members. Progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC