He's still invoking them as his gold standard of intel reform - This was part of Bush's non-answer from
yesterday's Q&A:
"Your question, however, the part that's really important is how do we regain credibility when it comes to intelligence?
"I mean, obviously, the Iranian issue is a classic case where we've got to make sure that when we speak there's credibility. . . .
"And so what I did was I called together the Silberman-Robb commission, Laurence Silberman and former Senator Chuck Robb, to take a full look at what went right and what went wrong on the intelligence; and how do we structure an intelligence network that makes sure there's full debate among the analysts; how do we make sure that there's a full compilation of data points that can help decision-makers like myself be comfortable in the decision we make. . . .
Coincidentally (or not) Laura Rozen at
War and Piece has some timely revelations about who was working for
Robb and Silberman, and the funding involved.
There are indications of ties to MZM. This is important because the Cunningham/MZM investigation is reaching deep into the corruption of govt contracting practices, including bribery in many forms-
"WH Intel Contracts Mystery Solved? I think Justin Rood offers a Eureka moment with his observation that the White House issued Mitchell Wade's MZM Inc. three contracts for "intelligence services" in 2004, at the same time that the White House-authorized Silberman-Robb commission on WMD employed three MZM executives as expert staff.
(...)
....If true, how did MZM shape the commission's findings? And is there any concern about the possible corruption of the commission's work, since it would have been performed by a contractor who has admitted getting classified US government defense and intelligence contracts through graft?
A particular conflict of interest would be any MZM role in the commission's findings on the analysis performed by the Army's National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC) in Charlottesville, Virginia (think, aluminum tubes). As Walter Pincus' reporting reveals, MZM systematically bought off key officials of the NGIC, hiring first their relatives and then hiring the key officials themselves.
Unlike say the 9/11 commission, the Silberman-Robb commission operated with almost no transparency -- zero public hearings, almost no public outreach, except for a few public appearances after their report was released. It doesn't build much good will or confidence in their findings when allegations like this arise.
Update: I do remember noting that Robb was one of the few Democrats who received a lot of money from Wilkes/Wade but couldn't remember which. It turns out Robb got $19,000 from Wilkes and Wilkes'-PAC. Hmm.
More from Rozen
here:
snip>
It's too bad the Silberman-Robb commission literature fails to note three of its professional staff members' employment by MZM, Inc.........
and
here