I have a confession to make that was inspired by this thread (now locked):
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x736507Lots of people on the above thread took the OP to task for living in a big house with lots of empty rooms. Well, I'm about to build a house that's even bigger, so perhaps you'll shit on me even more, but please, hear me out. Yes, I'm building an absolutely huge house: 5 bedrooms, 5 1/2 baths, home theater, 3 car garage with an extra detached 4 car garage (yes, 7 cars total) and about 6800 sq ft. Yup, its the kind of monstrosity that makes all you eco-minded folks tear out your hair out. However, like I said, hear me out.
In an effort compensate for this huge resource waste I'm building this house with every green building technique in the book. A Geothermal heating system that uses 60% less energy to heat the house. Solar panels that will provide 60% of the homes total energy needs. SIP based framing that uses 40% less lumber and uses fast growing "junk" trees to boot. The list goes one, but suffice to say that all of this green building will end up costing me 20%-30% more, and realistically won't generate a dime more profit for me. In simple terms, I'm giving up 100k-150k in profit to build green.
So is this justified? I don't know. The fiscal reality is that I could never build a 2000 sq ft. house with all of these green building techniques and make any money. Yes, you could build one for yourself and break even, and save money on energy costs in the long run, but as an investment it just doesn't work. I figure that the people that buy these Mc-Mansions are going to buy Mc-mansions regardless, so I might as well provide them with an eco-friendly choice. Perhaps it will merely sooth their guilty consciences, but perhaps it will spread the word on green building practices to the point that the more people hear about the options and actually make a difference.
Given the reaction on the above mentioned thread, I'm interested to hear what people think...