Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the deal with GM? Surely making more fuel efficient vehicles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 07:17 PM
Original message
What's the deal with GM? Surely making more fuel efficient vehicles
would have been a better "business plan" than the business plan that created their current situation.

Making SUVs more fuel efficient (quite a bit more efficient - 30-50% more) does not add much to the cost of producing the vehicle ($500-1000) as the Union of Concerned Scientists has shown (ucsusa.org) - off-the-shelf technology already exists to do this. This additional cost is quickly recouped by the buyer in terms of fuel savings.

I don't understand GM's business choices (the only real explanation I can come up with is that board members also have significant interests in oil companies).

Had GM (or Ford or Chrysler) produced more fuel efficient vehicles, along with a marketing campaign which explained to consumers how much money owners would save in a year on fuel costs, I believe consumers would easily have been persuaded to pay more up-front for vehicles. Surely such an approach would have generated more revenue than GM's campaign to "sell cars at the price GM employees pay".

(Had the GM/Ford/Chrsyler also made vehicles which are more reliable from a mechanical point of view, they also wouldn't have lost their market share to Honda/Volkwagen/Hyundai. (I don't refer to 'American" automakers because so many of cars' components are not made in the US, and the so-called "foreign" automakers have plants in the US).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think that GM is looking to get out of commercial vehicles
and return Detroit to a war product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. They got too big, too slow to advance
They had lousy management that spent half the time fighting over who had more power . I believe the Union got too big and rigid also. I mean both had a part in bringing them down but I place more blame in management , by far.

This buyout shows how bad things have become. Offering employees 35 grand to go away is telling. The money people only care about stock prices so they hurt the company. Its just a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. gm had bad policies and now they blame problems on cost of labor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7.  Accountants appear to be running the show and accountants
can only think about one thing costs, costs, costs, never about innovation and quality. This same problem has infected most large American Corporations. Accountants and attorneys are running them. All adding machines and no creative thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty_parts2001 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Never thought about it that way...
but it makes sense. Unfortunately, GM would probably start producing Sherman tanks, B-17 bombers and horse cavalry harnesses. Always a day late...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. GM paid 4 billion not to buy FIAT and couldn't find a place for Subaru
Terrible management for decades. Always a step or two behind the Japanese, the Europeans and even crosstown rivals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. GM needs to produce some great cars. The profits will follow.
What's wrong with their engineering department?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalUprising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Answer here
The Origins of the Overclass

Their efforts clearly succeeded. With the 1975 SUN-PAC decision, corporations persuaded government to legalize corporate Political Action Committees (the lobbyist organizations that bribe our government). By 1992, corporations formed 67 percent of all PACs, and they donated 79 percent of all campaign contributions to political parties. (20) In two landmark elections — 1980 and 1994 — corporations gave heavily and one-sidedly to Republicans, turning one or both houses of Congress over to the GOP. Democratic incumbents were shocked by the threat of being rolled completely out of power, so they quietly shifted to the right on economic issues, even though they continued a public façade of liberalism. Corporations went ahead and donated to Democratic incumbents in all other elections, but only as long as they abandoned the interests of workers, consumers, minorities and the poor. As expected, the new pro-corporate Congress passed laws favoring the rich: between 1975 and 1992, the amount of national household wealth owned by the richest 1 percent soared from 22 to 42 percent. (21)

http://home.att.net/~resurgence/L-overclass.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC