Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEVADA sues Bush: "What are they trying to hide?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:01 AM
Original message
NEVADA sues Bush: "What are they trying to hide?"


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The state of Nevada on Wednesday sued the Bush administration to compel it to publicize key documents on its plan to build a long-delayed nuclear waste dump in the Nevada desert.

Nevada Attorney General George Chanos sued U.S. Energy Secretary Sam Bodman and the Energy Department to require them to publicly release a draft application to build an underground waste dump in the Nevada desert about 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

The Energy Department had originally intended to file that application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2004 but the project has been plagued by scientific foul-ups and political stonewalling.

"Defendants have no legal basis for their actions in withholding the right of access to such documents," Chanos wrote in the complaint, filed in a Nevada federal court. "What are they trying to hide?" Chanos said in a statement. "If the repository is safe, you'd think they'd be anxious to prove it."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060322/sc_nm/energy_nuclear_yucca_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. "What are they trying to hide?" My question would be,
"What AREN'T they trying to hide?" Given that this is THE most secretive administration in the history of the country, the fact that they are hiding information on this issue comes as absolutely no surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northofdenali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good question, Nevada.
"What are they trying to hide?"

(from a state whose main-money town's motto is "What happens in Las Vegas, stays in Las Vegas".)

Maybe the state should look at one of it's casinos?

:sarcasm:

Reminds me of the signs up here that say "Caution: Rough Road". It'd be cheaper if the state printed a few dozen that said "Good Road Next XX Miles".

I hope Nevada kicks ass with WHATEVER resources it has to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Fuck NV they voted for that site TWICE and now they want to
cry about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. To begin with, Las Vegas and Clark country are blue.
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 05:13 AM by Bluebear
This site is closest to them, not the republicans from the northern areas. When did Vegas vote for this? Fuck NV indeed, plenty of us live there. Clinton vetoed this, incidentally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. While that may be true the big money Casino owners
could have pushed more voters to Gore/Kerry had they pushed the dump site issue to their workers as bad for business. Just IMHO....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Look, Clark county was the only county that went for Kerry.
By your rationale the world should abandon us and say "Fuck the USA, they voted for him" and leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Over all it was more important to NV that gays did not marry than the dump
so to me and maybe me alone, they got what they voted for..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. You're right. Nevada should not sue Bush & we should abandon them
Their '06 and '08 votes aren't crucial. Whatever, as they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. .
:hug:

As a Dem I feel sorry for all the Dems in the state. But the majority of the people in 2000 and 2004 voted for the ass in the WH and nobody really made a big deal about the dump then......

PS: IMHO Gore really blew NV by not pushing this issue more in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. .
:hug:

Agree with your PS.

And my basic point is, they should move the thing up north where Bushistas voted for him like 70-30. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. And like WV had Gore won NV
Florida would not have been an issue. :cry:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 06:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Had Gore/Kerry won any number of swing states Bush would not be in
office. So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. We don't really know what they voted for, do we? With all the
election fraud that was going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Did they have a referendum I'm not aware of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 2000 and 2004 election they love Bush... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. 2004 results:
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 05:24 AM by Bluebear
George W. Bush * (R) 414,939 50%
John F. Kerry (D) 393,372 48%

Harry Reid * (D) 490,232 61%
Richard Ziser (R) 282,255 35%

President: Clark County County (NV)
Updated 11/3/04 4:58 AM ET
99% Precincts Reporting Incumbent* declared winner
Candidates Votes %
John F. Kerry (D) 254,918 52%
George W. Bush * (R) 227,603 46%
Ralph Nader (I) 2,756 1%
None of These Candidates (Una.) 1,860 0%
Michael Badnarik (Lib.) 1,786 0%
Michael A. Peroutka (CST) 537 0%
David Cobb (Green) 473 0%

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/elections/2004/nv/prescounties/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. See my post #8 :) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. And see my #10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Nevada was a swing state, not a red state. And having followed the 2004
election there, I think it is probably another one of those states that ACTUALLY preferred Kerry. (There was a company here in Washington that was also working in Nevada, registering Democrats to vote and then tossing their registrations.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. The trashing of Dem voter registration forms
When that came to light, I thought there was an announcement of a criminal investigation. Did anything further develop? Was anyone ever indicted for this, let alone tried and convicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Great question. I don't know. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC