Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oceanfront property in Florida

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:38 AM
Original message
Oceanfront property in Florida


Two views of southern Florida's topography in a shaded relief map. On the left is a standard view, with the green colors indicating low elevations, rising through yellow and tan, to white at the highest elevations. On the right, elevations below 16 feet above sea level have been colored dark blue, and lighter blue indicates elevations below 33 feet. (NASA/JPL-Caltech/Reuters)

Melting ice sheets could spur oceans' rise: study
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060323/sc_nm/environment_oceans_dc_1

Now the Pentagon tells Bush: climate change will destroy us
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1153513,00.html
Sunday February 22, 2004

World Bank, Pentagon: global warming red alert
Weather of mass destruction bigger threat than terrorism22 February 2004
http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/world-bank-pentagon-warn-cli

The Pentagon Sounds The Alarm On Global Warming; Why Isn't President Bush Listening?
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0225-13.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does anyone have a map
or a link for the rest of American with these parameters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Try here:
http://www.geo.arizona.edu/dgesl/research/other/climate_change_and_sea_level/sea_level_rise/sea_level_rise.htm

However, if you proceed from there, I recommend a broadband connection (if even that will do...like all .shp based stuff, it takes FOREVER to load)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope Ann Coulter doesn't get stuck with a home under water!
Or worse, stuck *IN* her home under water!

No doubt the government will just buy out the rich people who lost homes, so they can go elsewhere. If any of them still live in America, that is. Most will have likely relocated to their area of expansion - India, China, etc. After all, you have to be where your company is growing, right?

And that surely won't be in America if The Bush Crime Family™ is allowed to continue abusing Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. I always wanted to live right by the ocean
...but not this way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. The 9th ward ain't worth saving, but please put up levies in Tampa!
Somehow I have the feeling that as the water rises the republican business leaders will beg for protection they would deny the 9th ward of New Orleans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. 100 million people globally live w/in 3 vertical feet of seal level
they say
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilber_Stool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Years ago I remember reading that
85% of all the people on Earth live within 60 miles of a shore line, to include rivers and lakes. I have googled this over the months and have never been able to confirm it. It dose sound plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Actually, that makes sense...
The first civilizations on the planet were founded in river valleys, where silt provided rich farmland and the rivers with easy access to fresh, drinkable, water. The Nile, Indus Valley, and Tigris/Euphrates systems were locations for some of the first civilizations on the planet. Being near an ocean means that you can easily trade with neighbors, ocean travel was the fastest for over 4 thousand year, and have easy access to food, fish most especially.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
7. Question for anyone who feels like putting their tin-foil hat on...
Do you think that the powers-that-be actually know that there is nothing that can be done about this, and that's why you don't see a major effort to try and do something about the situation? In other words, do you see a "Katrina-like" response to global warming/climate change, sit on your ass, cross your fingers and hope for the best?

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. Yes. Yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. I can market my house as future oceanfront.
If memory serves me correctly, I think it was about the time in 2001, when shrub withdrew from Kyoto, that he said something along the lines of, we'd better start preparing to live with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Looks like Disney World will need big huge walls
to protect their investment because Jeb and George are selling them down a river
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. Knowing her fate, Atlantis sent out ships
All together now--

And as the elders of our time choose to remain blind
Let us rejoice and let us sing and dance and ring in the new
Hail Atlantis!
Way down below the ocean where I wanna be she may be,
Way down below the ocean where I wanna be she may be,
Way down below the ocean where I wanna be she may be.
Way down below the ocean where I wanna be she may be,
Way down below the ocean where I wanna be she may be.

Atlantis - Donovan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. We own a piece of gulf front property just south of Cedar Key.. I watched
the reports last night, and we decided that the property is going up for sale on Monday.. We had wanted to build our dream home there.. (I want to get out from under it before it becomes unsaleable all togeather..) Florida is just getting to be too much. The hurricanes, while good for our business, are a real pain to deal with.. Our insurance is so expensive, and they changed the laws around to where it is harder to collect if you do have damage.. It's just too much to deal with..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Hearing a lot of that lately...
I live and operate a business in FL as well. Many of my clients reside in toney sections of S.E. FL, including Palm Beach. It is in Palm Beach that I am hearing most of what you stated in your post.
One quote just yesterday:"We have houses in several states. Florida is the most difficult one to maintain a house in".
R.E. has gone flat and the exodus has begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
converted_democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. We used to have several rentals, and we flipped for awhile..
Many folks on this board don't like flippers, but I don't care.. I worked hard for the money, and we turned crap properties into decent places to live and work.. All we have now is a piece of commercial property right on 19 close to Tarpon Springs, our home, and the gulf front property.. The rental business just got to be out of control.. With the way the laws work, you basically have to rent to anyone that has the money, and if they have kids it can take 3 months or more to evict, plus the time it takes to get the property back in order.. The last 3 eviction notices we served the people outright trashed the homes.. I'm talking stealing the plumbing, the light fixtures, putting holes in the walls, and ripping the electric out of the walls, and cutting the wires back as far as they could.. That was just the damage that was caused by the tenants, mother nature gave us a run for our money too.. The only decent tenants we ever had were senior citizens.. I wouldn't mind getting back into the rental business in another state, but I'd never do it in FL again..

Are you thinking of leaving FL too? We can't figure out where we want to go.. We have been talking about Mexico if the 2006 elections go badly, but that's assuming that the dollar is still worth anything.. We have been talking about the midwest.. I want to end up with some tracks of property one way or another, because if oil goes through the roof due to the dollar losing value, (among other reasons) I think American grown meat and food is going to be a precious commodity.. (It will no longer be cost effective to import food like it is now, and right now America does not really produce enough food to feed itself.) Plus, I was raised on a farm, so I like the atmosphere.. Where are you hearing people are planning on going? I like New Mexico and Arizona, but I think there are going to be water issues there not too far down the line..) We want to leave FL, but we are having a hard time figuring out where we want to go..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Where to go?
We looked at Arizona and that is still a possibility for us down the road.
I also like the idea of leaving the U.S. - Mexico, Costa Rica, and Panama are all on the list.
There are pros and cons for anyplace really. However, you will find literally thousands, if not millions, of American ex-pats in the three countries I listed.
Florida is definitely getting tough to handle. Rampant, uncontrolled growth one way until the new arrivals get their insurance and tax bill. It used to be a bargain of sorts to live here, but no longer..and that's if you can get insurance!
I see a major R.E. correction down the line for FL, particularly if we keep getting whacked with hurricanes each season. The supply, even now, is clearly outstripping the demand for new housing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alpizzy Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. Stupid Question....
Will the Great Lakes be inundated with salt water?
I don't know how high they sit. Would sea levels rise
enough to kill our fresh water source? This isn't
my area so please excuse me if this is indeed a
stupid question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. If I recall correctly, the Great lakes are from about 300 ft ASL
(Ontario) to somewhere around 750 (Superior).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alpizzy Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
16. Anyone know if bullshit floats?
If not, Rush may want to take swimming lessons. After endorsing the global warming deniers, he had better worry about his Palm Beach mansion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. Well, this may or may not come about
As more and more ice melts, more and more fresh water enters the ocean, it is theorized that all of this fresh water with put a halt to the oceans' major currents. It is currents like the Gulf Stream that keep Europe warm. And if you halt one current, you halt all of them, since they are all interconnected. Stop the warm currents from circulating and a new Ice Age will appear, thus trapping a lot of water in ice again.

So perhaps the ocean levels won't rise as much as they are predicting. But either way, rising oceans or a new Ice Age, we're in for some really rough times ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. I read a good book called Late Victorian Holocausts and he spoke
about currents and weather pretty extensively.

Might be worth a look.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
20. One thing is certain, President Gore would NOT have labeled
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 10:02 AM by Blue State Native
Global warming as "junk science". Thanks again Supremes! :sarcasm: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
24. This is the only issue that's going to matter in 2008
But it may be too late even then. We need Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. This is going to be the only issue for the rest of our lives.
It seems very likely that the drowning of entire cities is about to become a regular occurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. kick - yes, the only issue for the rest of our lives
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. The RWers will spin it



to look like it was the fault of the city's founders.


For establishing a city too close to the waterline.


Even if the city had to be on a river or a harbor for commerce reasons.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
25. Very interesting..... thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
27. So that light blue area will be swampland for a while
before it is submerged.
Prime real estate becomes swampland -- hmmm.
How much did you say you paid for that swampland?

Won't the mangrove trees keep some of it above water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Our chosen port security company
link to my journal today for a post about Dubai creating a rich man's oasis by a super city of sand islands built off their coast. To see this is to be stunned, no comment on global warming needed. This is a Bush partner remember and reality means nothing to them. Just ambition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. S. La., Bangladesh & the Netherlands would also be gone. LINK & EXCERPT:
Edited on Fri Mar-24-06 02:15 PM by Nothing Without Hope
Scientific American has a report on a new study published in the front-line scientific journal Science. (I was able to open it without registration):

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=0007FA05-10BC-1423-90BC83414B7F0000
SCIENCE NEWS
March 24, 2006

Climate Model Predicts Greater Melting, Submerged Cities




Caption: Image: COURTESY OF JEREMY WEISS AND JONATHAN OVERPECK, THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

Over the past 30 years, temperatures in the Arctic have been creeping up, rising half a degree Celsius with attendant increases in glacial melting and decreases in sea ice. Experts predict that at current levels of greenhouse gases--carbon dioxide alone is at 375 parts per million--the earth may warm by as much as five degrees Celsius, matching conditions roughly 130,000 years ago. Now a refined climate model is predicting, among other things, sea level rises of as much as 20 feet, according to research results published today in the journal Science.

Modeler Bette Otto-Bliesner of the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder and paleoclimatologist Jonathan Overpeck of the University of Arizona matched results from the Community Climate System Model and climate records preserved in ice cores, exposed coral reefs, fossilized pollen and the chemical makeup of shells to determine the accuracy of the computer simulation. Roughly 130,000 the Arctic enjoyed higher levels of solar radiation, leading to increased warming in the summer and the retreat of glaciers worldwide. The model correctly predicted the extent of the resulting Arctic ice melt, enough to raise sea levels by roughly nine feet.

(snip)

But sea levels rose as much as 20 feet 130,000 years ago and Overpeck speculates that may have been the result of additional melting in Antarctica. After all, the ice there is not all landlocked; some rests in the ocean and a little warming in sea temperatures could melt it or pry it loose. And this time around, the warming is global, rather than concentrated in the Arctic. "In the Antarctic, all you have to do is break up the ice sheet and float it away and that would raise sea level," he says. "It's just like throwing a bunch of ice cubes into a full glass of water and watching the water spill over the top."

Such a sea level rise would permanently inundate low-lying lands like New Orleans, southern Florida, Bangladesh and the Netherlands. Already sea level rise has increased to an inch per decade, thanks to melting ice and warm water expansion, according to Overpeck. And evidence that the Arctic is exponentially warming continues to accumulate. Indeed, in another paper in the same issue of Science, Goran Ekstrom of Harvard University reported a marked increase in so-called glacial earthquakes (seismic events recorded throughout the world when Greenland's glaciers slip past rock) since 2002. In fact, last year alone saw twice as many quakes as in previous years, with most of that increase coming during the summer months.

(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hrm. Any more recent stats?

I don't feel like waiting until 2010 to find out how much U.S. land BushCo has managed to lose
to the sea. Katrina/Rita took their toll, and apparently California recently lost a land area the
size of Rhode Island due to oil industry activities.

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h986.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-24-06 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. Gee, wonder how Limbaugh's 50 Mil Mansion will fare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC